Search results

All seems a bit over the top. If there’s trialists just don’t name them.

Anything other than no deal will mean EU law is applied as it was at the time. Even with no deal any future deal will likely require the same.

Give it a couple of years ...

Could be linked to their ongoing issues. Maybe the club don't want to send players to a club that seems to struggle to make it through the season every year for the last few years.

Not really been much in the way of response has there past 'look, SISU'. No chance, is there even a pitch in a state to be played on? I believe Boddy and his equivalent at Wasps are on good terms and would both like a return, the issue seems to be that those higher up at Wasps are blocking it...

Hard to top this.

That won't be the last time they use that phrase!

Did make me laugh that within hours of him making a comment at the gig the CT had an article up making out the council wanted to honour them with no mention of the bands comments.

The Wasps protest was nothing to do with the trust so not sure what that has to do with anything. It only shows the trust in a bad light as people were asking them to arrange something and got silence. It took a lot of pressure to get them to even tweet about it and when they did they made it...

Until this afternoon it was this:

Exactly my point. You need to see some action because there's been so many instances of Fisher making claims then not following through. It's the same with the Trust. They get stick then there's a meeting where they say they must communicate better, modernise, listen to fans etc and people take...

If Fisher is on CWR later today and says we want the club playing in Coventry so we're going to build a stadium would everyone forgive and forget and take him on his word?

Suspect if he was more highly thought of it would have been a fine and being told to get his act together.

If he's got a bad attitude surprised he's still here, would have thought Robins would have him straight out the door.

That rings more alarm bells for me. Could be they're planning to move you to not such a good deal when the AST expires and have this ready in case you don't agree to it. They then have everything linked up to boot you out and get someone in who will pay it.

Something doesn't seem right here. I've never had this happen, never heard of it happening and can find nothing online from either a landlord or tenants perspective suggesting it is a precautionary measure. I'd be looking for somewhere else to live. Can do without the stress of worrying if...