Search results

https://progressiveeconomyforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/PEF_Skidelsky_How_to_achieve_shorter_working_hours.pdf Not had chance to read it fully, only skimmed over it but the jist of it seems to be that working hours have been falling since the industrial revolution but this has stopped in...

Someone watched the hairy bikers last night :woot:

No it isn't. In fact the report states that the 35 hour cap in France has been ineffectual.

Care to expand?

I know people have said its the same at other clubs but there has to be something causing so many of the same injury.

I certainly missed where it was announced as Labour policy, have you got a link to that as the one you've provided just says 'Labour could implement a 35-hour working week if they won the next general election, the shadow chancellor has claimed'. Of course this all stems from Warwick Uni's...

Its not a worst case scenario report, I can't understand how you are struggling to comprehend that. You can literally look at the original version compared to the one published by the government and see where they have changed it to worst case without any of the contents changing.

I’ll probably just pay the 50p parking charge rather than opt for a £100 fine.

Raises a couple of immediate questions. The government were required to release all documents submitted to cabinet and / or committee. So either this is everything or they haven't complied. Neither of those options is good. Also the document itself was previously leaked via the Times. The...

If so this could be ideal:

This is something I find both fascinating and depressing. When you look at any polling or other research and compare voting intention against which policies people favour the results are all over the place. Makes it very clear that a huge number of people don't really look into what they are...

I didn't realise when people said about taking back control it meant the PM doing whatever he liked and ignoring parliament.

This is genuinely from a BBC News report

Plays for Chelsea.

People getting ridiculously carried away. Seeing things like 'this shows Sterling is the best in Europe', 'the future is bright', 'what a performance' etc. We're playing Kosovo, calm down. We know how this ends, we beat the shit teams then fall apart when we play someone half decent.

That's what I was expecting as well, try and bump the attendance up a bit. Fair play to the club, don't think most people would have been that bothered if they didn't get anything back.

How does the logic work that the result of a future general election will be an accurate representation but the result of the last general election, which of course took place after the Brexit vote, isn't an accurate representation?

Country cricket doesn't seem fit for purpose at the moment. What is the aim? If its to be the flagship competition that's not working as its getting shunted around the schedule to fit everything else in. If its to produce test cricketers that isn't working either. Not to mention ridiculous...