Search results

I think you'd have to pay someone to take the ringroad off your hands.

Yep. It's like telling people arriving at a zoo you're protected from the pride of lions with all these measures then just letting one of them loose.

Trouble is we need someone else to not go into lockdown so all those naysayers arguing that lockdown is not saving people can see the evidence it is. We've handled this incredibly badly, but we could have handled it even worse (and probably would have if the public hadn't basically decided to...

But if the next meeting only requires a majority, why bother making it 75% for that one? Why not set a time limit today and then put the 51% rule in for the final vote rather than coming back?

It's just becoming a joke. How can there be anyone left in the country who can't see they treat people as completely stupid if they put stuff like that out and expect it to be accepted as true?

It's ridiculous. He knows it going back up should lead to reintroducing lockdown but that stops the economy starting again which I imagine a lot of his party are looking for. So got to find a reason to continue on this path. I've heard it had something to do with the care homes, but it's way...

Privatisation proving to be a bit shit then.....

The way I read it was there was no need for a negative test response, so basically if you don't test them they can't be refused as they've not tested positive for the disease. If they truly wanted to protect the vulnerable then the first stipulation should be a negative test (even though this...

What a surprise. But hey, private enterprise makes things more efficient and better run.....

If that is the case I apologise. But the point stands that if this is such an issue to you why as you so steadfastly behind an ethos that wants to privatise everything and make it all about profit rather than the service? This is where it leads. The way you vote has directly led to this awful...

We'd lose on super-over.

So how do teams that are tens of millions or more in debt find that money? If they can I argue that they don't need admin, just financial restructuring. This really needs challenging properly though. If, say, the regulatory body of gas fitters said all gas trade creditors had to be paid in full...

I agree, but how has society ended up with that mindset? Who made it the 'me, me, me' society rather than putting family first and taking care of them? I also ask that if this place was so despicable why did you allow this person to carry on living there? You could have offered to become a...

If the money ain't there to pay them tough. That's before we get onto how the fuck they're even allowed to get away with the rule. Law states trade creditors are in the bottom rung for payment. Other football clubs are trade creditors. Get rid of this football creditors rule and you'd see far...

Sounds like a game at a county fair

That sounds incredibly unpleasant and unhygenic. Could it spread the disease (I've no idea if you ingest it if it can get through your system intact)?

I've had relatives stay in them as respite care rather than long term residents and I find them grim places. How the carers that work in them manage it I don't know. But what are your alternatives? The fact they're private and therefore as you put it profiteering is part of the policy of...

But we may be in a higher division next season, which will be harder and can we possibly afford to have one maverick? He was on loan in said division this season and barely played. Now you may be right about him getting the kick up the arse he needs but going on trned with this type of player...

Are you OK pipkin?

It might be a domino effect because if one or two do it and they've bought players from other clubs, those clubs then may not be receiving their full amount due (possibly only a tiny fraction of it) which will put extra financial burden on those clubs and they may not longer be able to survive...