Search results

Yes, and I don't agree with their actions - haven't for a long time. But anytime a different option is voiced at one of their occasion meetings its all 'we'll take it onboard' etc and then just gets ignored while they carry on doing their own thing.

They want their to be no criticism of Wasps or the council. What effect that has on the club doesn't bother them in the slightest.

What a joke. Refuse to tell their own members what they are up to and what happens in their meetings but demands transparency from others. Spot on. Couple of calls to CWR questioning Wasps and we've seen the social media accounts fire up and now the Trust. Was only a few days again Neil was...

Don't think he was ever a fan was he? Not sure its a coincidence that this all escalated on the Higgs Trust side after Derek Higgs sudden death. I can't imagine if he was still around he would have stood by while the club moved out and the stadium was sold to Wasps.

How would you even do it though? Presumably you'd have to have a party with that as a manifesto pledge get in. Then I'm guessing a referendum, and I don't think anyone is keen for another one of those for a while. Then in the highly unlikely event enough people cared enough to vote against...

Are they now admitting they were trying to get him in then? Haven't they always denied that when it was obvious to everyone else.

That rings a bell, hadn't he been involved in dealing with him at another club or something along those lines.

Maybe he lost all his money playing poker with Dale Evans.

Couldn't make it up. Even at the time there were huge doubts about his finances IIRC, think it was said then that it was his Dad who had the money not him.

It's ridiculous. CWR and Telegraph have completely invented a story that the indemnity was no longer a requirement, ran stories on that, meaning Boddy has to keep putting them right which they then run stories on as the club not returning. Literally nothing has changed and they've got two weeks...

They've shown themselves to be very sensitive to negative PR so keeping pressure on CWR and the Telegraph to actually do their job is a good first step. They are enabling Wasps to sidestep actually answering any questions. Would be nice if our Trust would apply some pressure but we all know that...

You're targeting the wrong people. Boddy, and everyone else involved on the clubs side, have repeatedly said they want the club playing in Coventry. Pressure needs to be put on Wasps to remove indemnity clause to enable a return to happen.

Don't like the sound of Hoffmans consortium if we should

That's reminded me I had exactly the same thing years ago in a second floor flat. Third time I had someone out for that he said he was just going to get his tools from the van and did a runner. After all that the fourth chap that came, and actually did the job, just leaned out the window to do...

That name rings a bell for some reason, did we sign someone from them once?

He's on a roll this week. He's either high as a kite or has rapidly progressing mental issues.

Assuming it can't be forgotten, which appears to be the case, they should make a statement but get a comment from an expert to back them up. Then make it clear that expert is happy to speak with Wasps, CWR and the Telegraph to answer any queries they have.

Makes it very easy for the Trust to issue a statement now though. Pretty much writes itself.

Thinks? Surely after being shown up last week he's looked into it properly and got a definitive answer. Even if that answer is Wasps refusing to comment it would be something. Of course he has, very convenient that as soon as the line the Telegraph and CWR stick to gets questioned its 'we know...

There's always next week!