Search results

Your entitled to your opinion of course, But for my money I’d prefer to give a 21 year old lad with only a years first team experience, and a dozen or so league games at this level a little more time to adjust.

I’ve already responded to you mentioning Sterling, what I also noted was your reluctance to respond to my question to you in that response. Your silence speaks volumes.

The young lad is struggling for form in a higher league than he’s ever played in before, and being used in a possition he’s not been used to, that dosnt mean he should be written off as not good enough. 12 months ago Mark McNulty was also also being written off by many if I recall. Some...

Just imagine, Madison and Wilson in the same England team, that really would be a feather in the cap of our youth set up!

Aren’t they all extinct?

Ogogo and Shipley in the middle with Kelly coming off the bench after an hour. Doyle needs a rest, I’d also rest JCH and Thomas.

Lol, Loved the way their no24 kicked the post, then looked at his boot!

Sterling has gone back to Chelsea to be “assessed” apparently! Sounds a bit ominous, hope it’s not too serious.

I did say that yes, but that was at the beginning of the season, when quite frankly, he was shite. Since then he has come on in leaps and bounds (quite literally) I’d say he’s been our most improved player, so I give him due credit! Do you have a problem with that Grendel?

I’d still say grimmer is a better defender, but Sterling is far better going forward, But if sterling keeps progressing in the way he has over the last few games, he’ll be some player.

Lol, doing a sisu, I liked that

You forgot Geoffrey Robinson, and Mick Mcginnity!

That’s the nature of big buisiness, anything could go wrong, who’s to say a massive property developer wouldn’t step in, bulldoze the arena and build houses on the land? (Only an example) If your trying to close a buisiness deal, you don’t publicise it till it’s done and the contracts are...

I think I’d be correct in saying the council and wasps were in talks, long before it was in the public domain.

1 buyer is not a market.

Your right, a sale of the club wouldn’t get them the ownership of the stadium, But it would remove the people who have caused the bad feeling to all parties. It would stop the JR, and allow a favourable long term solution regarding ccfc playing at the Ricoh. That’s about the best we can hope...

The council lying - that’s what politicians do!!! In buisiness you can’t trust anyone, It’s a sick game in which sisu rolled the dice and lost, no one is blameless however. Regarding the secrecy, That suited both sides, the council didn’t want another stadium owner competing for a...

And just to clarify my own possition here, I don’t like the fact that sisu own us, I don’t like the fact that the council sold the stadium, I hate the fact that the Ricoh is now owned by a London rugby club. And I despise the fact that ccfc’s future is in some doubt. But those ARE the facts as...

It’s quite simple really, The councils financial position is what forced them to offload what was a cash draining empty facility with a falling valuation, to anyone with a few quid who was willing to take it off their hands. If you owned a second house and rented it out, and you could find...

Perfectly put sir, Unfortunately I fear you are wasting your time on here, This is a forum of people who’s ability to see common sence, reason, and fact, is obscured by their blind passion for all things ccfc. Anyone with the ability to seperate passions from cold hard facts, MUST be a ccc and...