Search results

you can blame the fact the weather has such an affect on us on sisu.

They took management fees in 2011, they took increased management fees in 2012, since then they have become significantly more evil, significantly more predatory, have started to focus significantly more on whats best for themselves and damn everyone else and they have become more secritive...

we absolutely have no right to expect people to be loyal to us after the bomb squad situation, we do have the right to expect our players to play to the best of their ability when asked too and not to miss games due to phantom injuries.

Exactly this thread is hilarious and incredibly sad at the same time, what hope do we ever have of being completely united with some of the completely unreasonable and nutty posts on this thread. This is barely even news, acl bring in a small amount of money, good for them, Leicester's u21 game...

I'll get on my don't sell leon banner for the council house protest.

To be fair to Clarke (and yes he deserves serious criticism) it sounds like he made it obvious he wanted to go in the summer, so there has been plenty of notice to get a replacement, the reasons we are struggling to get one are completely sisus fault.

While I fully support honesty from the manager, I kinda wish he hadn't said it unless the deal is already done and dusted. If the deal falls through now and we end up having to keep Leon we have a pissed off player who the fans hate, who has fallen out with the manager and that despite having...

Very different to what he said on the offal "Pressley said: "Leon is a doubt for the game tomorrow. He injured the heel in his foot during the Arsenal game. "It is genuine injury and I would expect that to be the case. I have asked him to be professional and I'm sure that's the case. Of course...

No, I don't know it to be true, its just from the paper talk and rumours. It's also the only thing that makes sense, there is zero chance that ph4's plan was to get the unfettered freehold because he'd have even less chance of doing so than the no chance that sisu have and we know he is a...

Everyone wants ccfc to own the arena, to get all the match day revenue, to get revenue from pubs and hotels, everyone wants the arena expanded and developed, to get a train station etc etc. No one thinks this is a bad thing, PH4 was alledgedly in discussions to buy acl which is exactly what...

It's irrelevent anyway. If the council call back the loan which they almost certainly can't do and wouldn't do if they could, then acl would try to refinance, if they were unable to do this the council would have to take them to court for the money, it would likely end up with acl going into...

No Worries :-) Yes but buying acl seems to be the only reasonable way to do this and thats not what they are saying they want. They want the council to dispose of the lease and then sell them the freehold which is impossible.

You've obviously just misunderstood somewhere, Someone made a statement, I asked a question I didn't know the answer too as that bit of information was important to the discussion. You responded to me and attempted to answer my question but you obviously didn't know the answer and we've kinda...

If they want the freehold at all they have to pay market price, if they want the unfettered freehold well they simply aren't going to get it, while it might technically be possible it would cost a massive ammount more than it's worth and be incredibly complex, they could however buy the freehold...

I don't see why not, we were in trouble already when we signed leon and he has done very well with us putting his value up. There is also the fact that being on the same money would be attractive to him assuming a signing on bonus, more chance of promotion, more job security for the next few...

I can't see it happening, if sisu win the JR, seriously hurting acl and end up getting them on the cheap why would the council who now hate sisu even more than they do now agree a longer lease with them? other than for a very significant amount of money.

Sorry, it hasn't helped because I already understand the situation perfectly. It seems you arn't understanding me however. none of what you replied to me answered what I asked. What does ACL's Lease entitle them to in terms of what land is theirs during the lease and what are they allowed to...

again that isn't what I asked, it's also not a given at all, it's quite possible it is, but it's equally (or even more likely) that it's not. We pay the freehold owner of the block of flats we own (leasehold) a property in a tiny amount of money a year in ground rent. The freehold owner does...

This again is sisu trying to look reasonable but asking for the impossible. The council can't give a 99 year lease to sisu because they have a 47? year lease with acl, if sisu want a 99 year lease they have to buy acl and then negotiate with the council, the council can't take the lease from acl...

sorry? I don't understand the response? are you saying acl's lease entitles them to a percentage cut? that wasn't what I was asking, I mean does the acl lease allow them to develop land ie build a pub and if not does it prevent the freehold owner from developing the land, ie building a pub? You...