Search results

Awful isn't it. Its supposed to be a retro kit but I don't really see how. Nice to see that after over a year of no fans in stadiums first chance Chelsea get they're trying to fleece them and have changed their kit for todays match. At least they're only charging £105 for it :mad:

Love the way there's a video showing you round like its not going to be knocked down and student flats built on the site.

Could maybe suggest he's got something lined up. Its a bit of an unknown what the market will be like this summer with the impact of covid on finances so to turn down a contract he must be confident there's other options.

Blame the University of Warwick they're doing the modelling! But they aren't just picking numbers out of thin air or trying to get lockdown extended. If you read their report they give different figures dependent on how much of an increase in transmission the Indian variant brings which at the...

Absolute needs to be more help for people with mental health issues. Its an area that has seen huge cuts it recent years as its seen as a soft target compared to cutting something like caner treatment.

The cases cominging into the UK are covered on The BBC website.

Exactly, the quote in the Telegraph was "If certain criteria are met it's an obligation to buy,”. We have no idea that those criteria have been met and the club have released a statement saying his loan has ended and he's gone back.

Wages would depend on how much demand there is for him. He's managed about 120 minutes of football this season. His only prior championship experience is a couple of seasons with less than 10 appearances in 17/18 and 18/19. I'd definitely have him back, if we are confident of his fitness and...

Either the obligation still exists or it doesn't so either way the statement could be clearer.

Not really a surprise that when you have a player on loan with an obligation to buy who it has been reported has to meet certain conditions for that obligation to kick in, and may not meet those obligations, that people might think they aren't signing when the club put up a news article saying...

Inside No 9 was back earlier this week and brilliant as ever. The podcast is back on BBC Sounds as well which is well worth a listen.

Are these things cancelled because the booker has had some moral epiphany or because they are worried about running the event safely? Seems unworkable, venue says we can't put this event on and guarantee everyone's safety and security - what happens then?

Even if you ignore the accounts submission something was off about the way they went from not being able to pay wages to signing more players than anyone else without a takeover going through was a bit suspect to say the least.

Got to be a wind up, he's suggested the same for Baka.

Yep, and a lot of extra security. Man Utd team got to Old Trafford early to get in before it and Liverpool used a different entrance while their, empty, usual team bus went the normal way in.

This place.

Hope so, certainly needs to be tougher penalties. Although as recently as January the government were resisting calls to make changes to the law so I'm not too hopeful.

Wonder if we're getting a pub as well. If not at the Ricoh at least nearby. Yesterday the club posted about Dhillons wanting Sky Blue's memorabilia. Today they're posting about the Sky Blue Tavern. I know they already open on matchdays but if they're planning to make it a Sky Blue pub that...

Will certainly welcome it when it happens. They should probably have let their MPs know so they don't make statements saying its not needed when questioned on why they voted against it, 'It is self-evident that animals are sentient and UK law already recognises this fact'.

I think you could have made the 'they couldn't have expected this, get them home' argument a year ago but not now. Anyone travelling to any other part of the world knows perfectly well they're taking a risk. Reading articles like this makes you wonder just what people were thinking...