Search results

I thought we played well. I only watched from about 64 mins in though.

Yeah. I think we will save a little on half-time oranges and toilet paper, but that's about it

Rugby is completely different in terms of rivalry within the game. Like I say, football is completely different. Anyway, each and every to their own, but I really wouldn't be interested at all.

Do you think it did? Because for me it was a bit of a damp squib.

Very disappointed in you. You should be from here.

Torp was poorer than Allen on Saturday. At least Allen was in the mix of things. You would have barley noticed that Torp was playing.

Really cannot even begin to get myself interested in the notion of a GB team. Zero interest to me and I think the rivalry between the home nations is such that I can't see much enthusiasm for it really. City and England for me. Other GB stuff in the Olympics, then fine, but football is a...

Am I right in saying, that's the first time Torp and Allen have been partnered together? I do think that had a major bearing on things. Neither are great tacklers or ball winners and both seemed a little lost at times on Saturday.

That was just a 63 min appearance though, in the very first game of the season

Sad isn't it.

Same here. Mine are all on the NOW app. Very easy to navigate.

Said this before. Absolutely no harm in checking to see that they got it right and that new information doesn't change anything.

Annoying. I didn't know this until it was too late. Hopefully, I can catch around the last 30 mins or so.

Physicality isn't everything, but at the same time, you don't want players who can get knocked off the ball too easily, or get outmuscled time and time again. For all the pluses, it's the downside of Jamie Allen.

You can do batter than that surely.

Nope, this is all just down to a poster who just can't spell syphilis

It is, because who in their right mind has heard of "cab start attacks?" That's definitely nonsense alright.

Or the next 5 letters of the alphabet either