Search results

So is your view that the only rational reason for moving to Northampton is to distress ACL and so pick up the Ricoh at a cheap price?

Clarke is quite a "tidy" player at centre back, but with the squad we have at the moment the prospect of playing against a good old fashioned big third division centre forward is, frankly, pretty scary!

I'd agree with all of that. After a dodgy start, we controlled possession in the first half without very often looking threatening. Second half was much better. Possibly partly down to Nuneaton tiring in the heat, but also much more direct play by City. Thomas was excellent and controlled the...

But they were offered a deal to reduce the £1.3m rent to £400k. They have rejected that and are instead moving us to a stadium with a maximum capacity of circa 7k and (even in TF's world) likely attendances of 3k to 7k. So they have saved £400k in rent, but at the cost of: - Rent to be paid...

We certainly get some payments from the FL, but I think I recall that relegation from the Championship reduced these payments by £33 to £4m.

What's the phrase? - "You need a long spoon when you sup with the devil" (or something like that).

As you rightly say though, Yeovil and Oakland are noteable because they are exceptions to the general rule. It's not impossible to go against it - it's just not very likely.

At least I could go to it then - NOPM

I'll be there :p

As you were asked earlier - how did it take "PRIORITY" (excellent use of capitals by the way) "over CCFC's HOME" (gosh, there it is again - very impressive) fixture!!!!!!!!!" (got to be honest, I think you overdid it a bit with the exclamation marks - sometimes less is more)?

Which January did you have in mind?

I tend to agree, but Highfield Road aint coming back and the Ricoh is so much better than Northampton.

Or the intelligence of the person writing it?

The way things are looking at the moment, I'd say aiming to keep us in League 1 was pretty ambitious!

Let's just review the very basics of contract law shall we. One party makes an offer. The other party accepts it. There is now a contract. Nothing has to be written down (although the issue is then proving what has been offered and accepted), nothing has to be "stipulated" (whatever that...

You mean in the days before embargos? :)

Well done to Bristol City - happy memories of watching games at Ashton Gate in my student days.

Reckon so. If I understand it correctly, acceptance of the CVA would involve the acceptance of a small sum for the termination of the lease. If they were going to accept termination of the lease, I'd assume that they wouldn't be taking this action against Northampton. So, if all of that...

Agreed - I'd been wondering when this avenue would start to be explored.

OK - we're aware that your default position is to snipe. That's your choice. I had thought that you were against the move to Northampton. This is, in my view, potentially very helpful to the fight to stop that move. Can you honestly only find negative things to say about it?