Search results

So if they do less hours those hours become available and we have more people in work do we not?

So we just wait for them to do it again? Cos they will. Like a naughty child given what they want they'll just keep on dong it knowing they'll get a way with it. Given them a smack and they stop. So do you want to put up with the short term problems now or have this same situation going on...

You've really fallen for the nonsense the rich have peddled so they can have more money haven't you? You talk about the jobs their money creates. Firstly, the argument was that the vast majority of their wealth is non-tangible and doesn't really exist so that money isn't getting spent anywhere...

Disagree about bailing out the banks being the right thing to do. They caused their own problems, so why should the taxpayers bail out an industry that supposedly believes in free market and 'dog eat dog'? It basically told them they can do what they like and fuck everyone over with no...

Hence why I wonder if he may try to gain even more control over the court in some way or another for judges who will just toe his line.

So basically trying to get a Rep/Trump court to rule on everything.

Sadly, yes. But that's nowhere near enough control from him. One through the Reps dragging out an Obama pick so he left office before confirmation. One that annoyed me the most was RBG. At her age she must have known there was a chance she wouldn't survive and should have stepped down during...

I agree, but also a big part of that is squad depth. Having a player who can come in of a similar/same standard so your first choice doesn't have to pay 3 games in a week can play a massive part in not picking up non-contact injuries.

I think our courts are slightly better protected, though not completely, from this sort of political machinations. I have wondered if Trump could basically get members of the SC arrested and convicted (or bumped off) and thus replace them with his own picks.

How would that work? What if two courts in two different states are ruling on effectively the same issue? How could they both apply nationwide when they could totally contradict each other?

Trouble is raising a tax free threshold ultimately is more benefiical to the wealthy as they benefit from not hitting the higher tax bands as quickly. as far as I'm concerned the tax free amount should be the amount it costs for basic housing, food and energy. Basically we need to make work...

Always wonder how that plays out against injuries from Xmas onwards, especially if you have a squad without significant back ups to allow players to rest.

The sponsor going over the tramlines really ruins 22/23.

Checkatrade. Which handily gives us a chant for him.

Because they'd be a Derby fan.

But instead going through it sleep deprived with a crying baby and a ton of carry on luggage to look after it.

Happy to win a few rounds in this early on as we can use it as match practice. Once the games start piling up less bothered.

FFY

Only when we play him as an emergency attacking midfielder.

Bit difficult to be the leader of the free world when you're doing everything in your power to make the country you actually are in charge of as un-free as possible.