Search results

Well..... If they'd taken the first deal SISU wouldn't have incurred all the extra losses that have (according to them) so increased the debt since then and if they'd taken the second deal, we wouldn't be exiled in Northampton playing in front of record breaking (for all the wrong reasons)...

I've always thought that it was a great idea to give kids free tickets - get them young and all that. As was posted earlier, what makes it slightly different in the context of debates about Sixfield's attendances, is that because the total attendance is so low - the proportion of free tickets...

Of a sort :D

Hoffman offered £1 for the shares (effectively the price SISU originally paid to purchase them) together with deferred consideration for SISU dependant on success (effectively the same deal that SISU gave to Robinson, as I recall) together with money to purchase the Higgs share of ACL and (as I...

Rugby Town, Coventry City or both? :D

Too close to Northampton for my liking :D

With another assumption :D

That wasn't the impression given by your earlier comment.

Surely he should have got branded nappies!!

Used to watch Wolves most weeks when I was a kid - until I was old enough to travel to Coventry on my own. Used to stand on the South Bank and support whoever was playing Wolves.... My first 2 trips to Wembley were with Telford in the 1970 and 1971 FA Trophy finals. And their left winger...

So, I'm guessing that your point is that during the time he was there he did nothing to improve matters - probably made things worse?

Thought I had my Saturday afternoon sorted - watch Telford, Shrewsbury or Wolves. Turns out that Telford and Shrewsbury are both away and Wolves play on Friday night. Bet bloody SISU arranged that just to piss me off a bit more!

That seems to be a remarkably jaundiced way of saying that he completed the job that the government put him in to do.

Sixfields????

I agree. I'd always try to persuade people not to go, but wouldn't "attack" them for so doing, firstly because I don't think that it's right and secondly because I think it's more likely to make them "dig in" to their choice and so be less open to reasonable persuasion.

A couple of points: Firstly, while I'd be delighted if SISU decided to depart, I think that the primary aim of NOPM is pretty generally agreed to be to get us playing back in Coventry, so if that were to happen, I'd certainly consider that to be a success. The more general point though, was to...

And no doubt if that happens someone will post on here that it proves NOPM is a failiure. While we play in front of the lowest crowds in the division........ While we play in front of the lowest league crowds in our history............

We don't know their reasons with any certainty. I've wondered if they might have rejected it to keep open the possibility of an action against CCFC Holdings/Otium, on the grounds that Ltd and Holdings were effectively one and the same (TF's "the accounts are a bit of a mess etc).

It's not working - after one home game?

That would vary from person to person. I'd guess that most people would go back to watching City, probably joining in with any "We want SISU out" chants. However, what seems clear is that SISU's "customer relations" will be gradually moving people from the former camp to the latter