Search results

Makes zero sense . What is being suggested is that we didn't want to make another payment so didn't play one of our best strikers when the ultimate prize in the Premier League is worth close to 200 million these days

Always liked the purple and yellow

Potential house swap with Gyokeres?

Totally agree and if we are going to get the best out of EMC then I think he needs the ball early so he can try and isolate his fullback

Wonder if he needs to see a sports psychologist? He has everything needed to be a success at this level but seems very shy and passive.

I can , two years left on his contract and seems to love the place .

Can see Jamie Allen going to Stoke , Robins was a big fan of his and always talked him up .

Eccles was playing under Lampard until he got a calf(??) injury . I think Lampard sees him as a more athletic partner for Grimes when the need arises . I can't see him leaving for a lesser club just to get more games

He can be unplayable at times but can be just as abject in others

Feel we need to find a young Vik from somewhere, obviously won't find one as good but one with similar attributes

Yet Luton play with wide players and throw the ball into the box at every opportunity and still Morris doesn't score many headed goals ?

Lati is useful to the squad as he covers more than one position, would prefer Binks to go if it was a straight choice

He's tall I grant you that but I was referring to the art of heading the ball which Simms and Wright both struggle to do well a lot of the time

It isn't necessarily a big striker just one who anticipates better and times their jumps , look at Rudonis heading ability in comparison

Surely cost implications negate this happening in both cases ?

It really isn't

Isn't that what most managers try and do though when they use the loan market ?

Simms was our starting number 9 for the majority of our surge up the league . Agree he should score more but he adds to the team when he is playing well