Search results

Frankly I don't give a shit when they spoke, the fact remains we had an agreement in place and, despite your claims earlier today, Frasers are refusing to honour those terms. This is exactly what some of us were worried about when Ashley got involved but kept being told we needed tin foil hats...

you've just confirmed what shmmeee posted there. that says talks prior to completion not prior to the court date

What a surprise that it turns out its not the same terms as the current deal

there's nothing to grasp. the reports regarding eviction are either true or false and given the game at the weekend was moved I tend to lean towards it being true. I couldn't give a shit about SISU, Ashley, Frasers or anyone else, my concern is the club. You don't start an eviction process and...

not sure there's much they can do. their only options are fines, points deductions or the nuclear option of kicking us out of the league. they can't force Frasers to give us access to the stadium

I don't for a second believe SISU have anyones interest but their own at heart. It doesn't mean I believe Ashley and Hoffman are our saviours. They both have track records that leave a lot to be desired so when pretty much the first thing that happens under new stadium ownership is we're issued...

its not the same thing though is it. if you have an agreement with a company and that company still exists how do you end up with the agreement no longer being valid and a new one being required. Especially if we're supposed to believe the new agreement is on the same terms. I don't see in what...

Yet when it was flagged up as a potential issue that Ashley would try and pull this kind of stunt it was dismissed as impossible Why was the existing deal directly with Wasps and why would a new deal be directly with Frasers. Surely any deal to play at the stadium would be made with the stadium...

exactly this. if you want to take the club over threatening to evict the club is hardly the way to get the fans onside.

how do you class the club putting in a bid to own the stadium they play in as 'playing silly buggers'. they were perfectly entitled to put a bid in, in fact most people have been urging them to do that for years

If, as GIMOC suggests, there is a new deal on offer which is the same terms as the existing deal in place why is there even any need for a new deal. The company the deal was made with still exists doesn't it, why would the current deal not be valid?

at the very least you would do it as basic PR. if Frasers aren't in they wrong here why would they let their brand be trashed on a national level, this is quickly gaining traction with the likes of Sky News, MOTD, Linekar etc. if they aren't in the wrong would take them a matter of seconds to...

If that's the case we should see a statement from Frasers in the next few minutes saying the existing arrangement can and will continue

I hate SISU as much as the next person but that's stretching things beyond credibility to blame them for Frasers issuing an eviction notice

it will be something along the lines of its a private business, nothing to do with us

Maybe just me but as a CCFC fan if I had a connection to the owner of the stadium and potentially a position on the board on the stadium management company I would be more concerned with this situation than a holiday.

No internet or phones in Qatar?

Why didn't Ashley save himself the trouble and check with the experts on here who were telling anyone who suggested something like this might happen it was impossible. Frankly I don't want anyone who would play games like this within a million miles of owning the club and the less said about...

I work from home which is costing a fucking fortune in heating but the chaps in the office have been told the heating isn't being turned up to normal temp this winter to save money.

isn't there some rule that a certain number of youth games have to be played at the clubs main ground