Search results

What would be his ideal partner? He is not a target man, Platt holds the ball up far better. He is not a skillful centre forward as he is too tall and obvious. He is not a natural finisher either So what is his ideal role and who would be his ideal partner?

Forgive me, but I thought Platt was our target man and a bloody good job he has been doing too.

if it was on its own page, full window with a link at the top it may be used more.

Thats because its crap mate. Hence why I asked for a decent one. Cant you trial one?

They were all doing it. Must have been an instruction from Thorn.

Rob you promised you wouldn't out me in public.

I think that our squad has always been missing a PROPER centre forward. Juke is a mis firing one in my opinion. Nimely Is the missing link.

How about a proper live chat without new threads being listed in the same box?

I think there may be too many sub sections mate. Other than that you have a great site here with a great community.

His throw looked more dangerous than gunnars.

Steve was at the game today scouting for sunderland. Wonder who he was watching? Plenty of notes were taken.

Whoever is in charge of media. WELL DONE a mention on radio and flyers everywhere. Good effort.

I think its on for 11 weeks isnt it?

Definitely but then I have a young family to support and can only afford the time to support the cause in a virtual fashion. Dont get me wrong I am totally in support of the theory, but I dont support all the methods.

I think when Jan speaks to TF again he should ask for a representative of the club to communicate with fans on here. This is the most popular Sky Blues Forum, where the most fans come together to talk so why not?

That'd be Joe Elliott until he was suspended wouldn't it?

I would like to see this:- ..................Murphy Christie Keogh Cranie Herman ..................Deegan ..............Thomas Baker ................Sheffers ............Eastwood McDonalds

But Jan, that's exactly what SOC is and I don't think it should be anything but that. If the Club/SISU want to make the club a success, then these are the type of people they need to talk to and not an organisation that portrays itself in a formal manner? At the end of the day, no Formal...

Phew? Not sure why you thought it would be a close call?

It does kind of detract from it being a society and more an organisation. I guess that the Board must get together and plan the actions because there is nothing in the minutes about discussions with attendees and who came up with the "Back the Boys" idea.