Search results

I sort of agree, as we saw from Wrexham yesterday how effective having strikers in the box and decent delivery into them can cause problems. Vik likes to drift out wide and run at players, but doesn't tend to look up or try and play others in, so a strike partner is likely to not get a great...

It's far from perfect but I think overall it's better than it was a few years ago. A lot of the problems it has are just as bad as any other city/town. It could be better, but it could also be worse.

I didn't like that MR rested the likes of Gyok and Hamer at the start - I'd rather he start strong, get control of the game and then be able to rest them. But to use it as a means to say he should be fired immediately given what has happened overall in the last five years is utterly ludicrous...

Quite a lot of an NFL squad are seen as entirely dispensable. Don't know if they'd still be there the following week as they could just be cut. Even the big names can just be traded to whoever the team likes at a moments notice and the player has to just up sticks and get on with it. It's...

Bit easy when the answer is above each one. Though not sure how they all make Smash.

'Cos he's shit?

Nope, doesn't fit into the Quo song.

Well the difference is that your side of politics hasn't been rejected and has led us to this position. The last time the other side of politics weren't rejected the NHS was providing the best service it has for ages. And it didn't do that because of massive cuts to immigration. In fact...

Migration isn't uncontrolled. It's just papers like the Mail that say it is to scaremonger. And if it was, don't you think the party of law, order and sensible migration should have fixed it in the last decade? Especially if they're putting so much strain on resources. Or are bleeding heart...

But that just shows that immigration isn't the cause of the problem and that reducing it massively will not only not solve it but likely make it worse. It seems that what is being said is: "These new people are paying in. But there's others that are already here who aren't so therefore we can't...

All I've got in my head is Harry going "I really, really, really, want to...er... zig-a-zig-ah" as if he's Hugh Grant in some Richard Curtis movie.

Nope. Says on the offal that due to registration deadlines he won't be eligible tomorrow.

So in that formation who wears what number? If you have the WB's taking the 7 and 11 of wingers, who are the 2 and 3? CB 2,3,4 WB 7, 11 DCM 5,6 AM 8, 10 ST 9 Personally I'd prefer CB 4, 5, 6 WB 2, 3 CM 7, 8 ACM 10, 11 ST 9 Not that it matters these days.

I don't know, why did a RWB wear the number 10 at Rotherham ?

Just as you aren't with what me (and others) are writing.

Name sounds like he should be a character in Downton.

So instead we should kick out or refuse entry to those that are contributing positively? You do realise that if we did that and the population didn't grow via immigration, the problem would still get worse as the amount of money provided per head would go down and the standard of the NHS would...

By getting the government to put that money that the immigrants put in towards the NHS so it can support the growing population. You're fighting the wrong battle.

It's far more than politicians 'don't help' - they are actively the problem. The infrastructure can't keep up, but immigrants are net contributors meaning that they are putting in funding to increase and improve that infrastructure. How much do you think could've been done with the money that...

So by your own admission the fault is not with the immigrants. It's with the politicians.