Search results

Just for Astute; Arron Banks faces new claims of misleading MPs over Brexit

What the EC thinks about the source of funds and why they have handed it over to NCA:

You spent weeks on Selmayr. Going round and round in circles. That is obsession. Then May appoints her loyal lieutenant as head of the U.K. civil service using Brexit as an excuse and you vanish. Bent as they come. May not then? You don’t defend May, you just go very very quiet when she does...

He has not been charged of anything yet. I think that is relevant.

Hardly. Much of the information is publicly accessible or has been mentioned on tape at the select committee. Surprisingly enough, Wigmore of Belize didn’t offer this proof, if it is proof of anything, at the select committee.

Revealed: Isle of Man firm at centre of claims against Arron Banks

Any examples of my proven positive support of George Soros? Apart from me not hating him.

Can’t be true. The BBC is pro EU and only allows remainers a platform ( hahaha ).

I don’t have an obsession with Banks. I think he is one of the „enemies of the people“ and want to see him exposed for that. I am not particularly interested in George Soros, but I am interested in the demonising of him. Why do the right constantly do that? He is Jewish and a financier in...

The HoC select committee was weeks ago. The video of the Banks walk out under pressure is on YouTube. Still seeing as you think Farage has gone away, I am not surprised that you missed the claims about Banks.

It would be easier for you to have a „debate“ if you were able to read what the „opponent“ has to say. That is if you are interested in a debate as opposed to hoping for approval of everything you say.

He’s on TV on Sunday with Andrew Marr, so anyone, including Astute ( and the NCA ) can see what his version is.

Yes, Mister neutral, you blocked me to be able to claim you know nothing of any negative aspects of your bs. Problem is that I am not the only one who can see what is happening. You can’t bullshit everyone.

Yes. That is correct. He claims to be the ultimate beneficial owner which means he is the donor, not the companies. That is his argument not mine.

Using funds from a foreign country/ person. Using funds from an offshore account. Not cooperating with a commons select committee. 1 and 2 yet be proved of course. 3 not a crime, but enough to be referred to the NCA for further investigation. How much clearer do you need?

You knew all about Russian sloppiness though.

Which is why they keep getting exposed and hopefully Banks will be exposed by their carelessness and his greed.

You have been answered on here and can easily google Daily Mail. As you have done often enough in the past. Here is another link to a leaver who bent financial rules: Brexit: The Movie producer charged with £500,000 fraud

The UK government issuing guidance as requested by the HOL and outside of the regulated campaign, is not similar to a foreign power using propaganda financed by funds channeled illegally by a British subject ( if this is proved to be the case) to further it’s strategic aims. The content from...

Very interesting. Now back to millions of false posts trying to stir up pro Brexit anger and anti Muslim hatred. That is not in a history book. That happened and is still happening and has been more successful than any Cold War measure. Even better for Russia, they can wage a propaganda war...