Search results

I am not missing the point at all. The war Bliar took us into on a lie cost us countless billions alone. That is why borrowing shot through the roof. There was no money. There never is. We run on budgets and debt. Look it up. Sounds like you are in for a surprise. Most Labour governments...

It is like I have been saying all along. He isn't assertive enough and sitting on the fence does more damage than good. A lot of those still undecided will remember him not answering the questions people want answering more than what is going on with the NHS. Boris is a buffoon. Someone more...

He was investigated for links to atrocities committed. None were found. He was investigated because of his links to these organisations including the propaganda machine including their news letter. So in other words they didn't find anything illegal. But there was enough to investigate.

We have been through this one countless times before. Borrowing up from 7.6 billion when Labour took over to nearly 180 billion when the Tories got back in.

I watched both of them in the early hours. I know you don't want to hear it but they were both poor. But Boris might get away with it more. His answer to everything when deflecting was about getting Brexit done. About half of the UK wants it done. So about half heard what they wanted. But...

Don't you want it sorting?

Not unexpectedly though. But of course it doesn't matter that Labour won't come out with a positive response on which way they want it to go. But last night should have shown you the damage it is doing.

And on a different note.... Hadn't noticed before but Swinson constantly saying Bregsit. I would understand if English wasn't her first language as learning another language is never easy to perfect. She should know what the word is by now.

Either a lot of people still want out of the EU or the trust Boris and the Tories more than the other leaders/parties :rolleyes:

Easy to say when you have a single holiday that is longer than most people get all year and then get several more.

So what was the rent and what did both of us say what it was? I suppose you can try and discredit what you are trying to use now :smuggrin:

Go on then. Which part disagrees with me. Because it contradicts what you tried to say.

So what don't I understand? Just name something for once. CCFC hardly had anything to do with the building of the Ricoh. Now you make out it was something totally different.

No change to anything that happens before we leave.....If we do. It will still come under EU law in EU courts wherever is decided. And to add to that the Ricoh was built with EU money so they might well look into it more than usual.

Your guess is as good as mine. Could have been a non disclosure clause. Or both sides might have acted like twats and didn't want anyone to know.

Exactly. Then you ask me what I am trying to prove then mention Juncker for saying just what you have said. Then you say it is me :smuggrin:

And backs up everything I have said. Grendel.will put his spin on it soon though.

And state aid it is. Pittance? Evidence? We sold them off because of what Richardson did to our club. Maybe administration should have been the way instead. But you are here to defend Richardson and attack CCC. Of course not because there isn't any to back up what you say.

Did the Tories have a say in where they went? Look forward to seeing your excuse.

Back to pathetic comments again I see. So nothing to do with Labour wanting to kill off private education? Strange when so many Labour politicians have had a private education including the present leader. So is finishing off private education a good idea or bad? Because you jump on my post...