Search results

McCallum struggling today. Seems well off the pace

Well done O'Hare!

Will depend on scan, then grade of injury. Medials initially suspected. Hopefully nothing more....

Dabo: Medial ligaments in knee. Will have a scan. Usually anything between 2-6 weeks..... Huge blow, don't expect to see him on Saturday!

Seen them given...usually against us.... Ref too far away and offence wrong side for lino to see....

To be fair, through a crowd of players and a slight nick off a defender, he's done ok to shovel that behind... Bit of luck but was in the right place. Horrible one for any keeper that one....

Bench doesn't offer much in terms of changing the game... maybe Bapaga apart....

....interesting YouTube synopsis...

There is no doubt that he could get forward and put balls into the box. We could not utilise that (yes, there is the defensive balance issue also...) due to our formation (generally one up) and the type of forward we have.... I feel he will fit into Rotherhams style of play, and be very effective!!!

FYI Speedie87; Diving underneath this morning; Barrier on slip down to Henrys Field Active traffic lights on Baginton side. Not a lot going on on Jag side. I'd say you probably wouldn't even be able to access it from that side. Obviously did not look open.

They are moving the ball/have moved the ball well, so much more movement than when we played them a few weeks back (Pulis-ball). Playing with energy too. (Hopefully will feel it in their legs come Wednesday!) Going to be another very tough encounter.

Drive under on my way to work tomorrow. I'll have a look, don't think anything but construction traffic has been near it. Unless it is officially open, I'd doubt there would be pedestrian access. I'll get back tomorrow.

"There is no cause to rule the goal out either then or by today's laws" -Yeah! Agree! - that - if you can be bothered to read all my previous spiel, is exactly what I was trying to discuss with Adge! "He can only be penalised offside from when the ball is played by a teammate. When the cross...

That's the one!!

Technically, when he was behind Given - this "is" an "offside position" - don't know the exact wording - Adge may, but you can be stood in an offside position but not be "offside" - (this is where then the whole playing the pall forward, interfering with play, being active aspects come into it)...

Cheers Adge - however, this is/is this not, where things and aspects of specific laws seem down to interpretation? - Genuine question. Firstly - you stated previously that part of the law had changed to infer that a player off the pitch, was classed as being "on the pitch - goal line...

This one was more to do with the Keeper having the ball under control, laws changed now that you aren't allowed to obstruct or challenge/attempt to stop the keeper from releasing the ball.

Heard a stat this week that statistically, playing the ball out from the back, advances the ball, in possession, higher up the pitch than a kick from the keeper does!

Given played the ball.... deliberately, by rolling it in front of him to kick from the ground! Surely, according to laws, and exactly the same as last night, the goal stands! Can't see any difference, the rule change making it even more comparable to last night in terms of him being classed as...