Search results

It depends on the job really. Some dictate wearing business attire if meeting with clients etc, others don’t. The job I had in mind was running all the social media & PR stuff for CCFC when I buy them, so you’d be ok in casual, except when you had to meet with Nick Eastwood, then a wasps shirt...

shame, I have a job going I was considering you for, £60k, company car and all the perks, but....suit and tie is obligatory. Oh well, I’ll find someone else...

Ah, arson, not stabbing.

Wasn’t their a recent stabbing where one of the 2 guys caught lived at petitor crescent?

was he taking the video ??

could that be because other major cities are better to live in?

what a great post US, well done. I imagine all these mouthy t***s are quaking in their boots hearing you are done with them. Very well done. Put the fear of god into them I imagine. Excellent work. Well done xx (was there enough well done’s in there for you dear chap?) :-)

hackney tried to play it for laughs on gmk, but on the hoof he made his feelings very clear. He hated our team (any season) hated our city and hated our fans. Was quite vitriolic to us. Never quite sure why some were fawning over him tbh. He regularly pasted posts he’d made on gmk on the hoof...

same here at home...

I think there’s enough moaners there as it is...

Wasn’t there a couple of games v the Bentleys hoof mob?

Nick, it was a joke. No need to explain yourself.... or is there ?? ;-)

nick kept coming in offering help to sort the server problems, but secretly he had hacked it and kept bringing the site down.... ;-)

Was it on gmk where he was posting his betting slips to “prove” how many wins he’d had?

cant remember who it was, but he saw the girl and said what a minger, or something equally insulting, not knowing it was smiles daughter. Smiles went all Rambo like, threats galore.

Add my name to it

I think the clarification of what “legals” actually means would take some time given the EU complaint is not seen as “legals”. Once bitten etc.

They're regularly talking, Boddy confirmed that ages ago. Softening? I have no idea, but I doubt it. No idea if they have acknowledged the indemnity or not, but it's hardly deniable is it? Everyone knows it. tbh, after the meeting I attended, I was willing to give the trust a chance to see if...

was that when the indemnity clause was “negotiated” ?

hasn’t he said the same thing? but it’s the same stuff we’ve known about for ages. Just saying “wasps need to drop the indemnity” won’t just make it happen, whoever says it. the bit they’ve said which is weird is wanting transparency. The trust have had various meetings with different groups...