Search results

They're Saturn-Uranus

I'm surprised by that because I thought he died a couple of years ago! I wonder who it was that actually died?

As a general rule the rules are clunky and over-complicated either because people have not been playing in the spirit of the system and they've needed to close loopholes or it's deliberate to make it very difficult to establish how much should be paid. I don't know about the construction...

Which is why the rate of tax should increase the more you have.The more you take from the higher amounts (who will be more than able to get by without them) the less you need take from those with more moderate means.

There is the argument that those that 'spunk it up the wall' are paying more tax because they're paying VAT on what they spend it on. Showing restraint and saving shouldn't be discouraged but there has to come a point whereby the amount saved becomes extortionate and it should be taxable in...

As is your right. Point was that tax is seen as this terrible thing that is a complete waste and has virtually no benefit whereas things like dividends should be lauded and encouraged despite it often just being added onto someone already large bank balance. Last time I checked making sure...

The problem with tax is it's a dirty word that the rich have spent a long time convincing people is a bad thing. It needs a rebrand. It's a public dividend.

If that nurse had significant pension payouts then yes.

There's nothing to stop there being a LEL for it. If you set it at the rate of the state pension everyone recieving that would be exempt. Then it gets paid on private pensions.

I'm quoting percentage because that's what the definition of progressive/regressive taxes are. A progressive tax is one where the percentage paid progessively increases the more you earn. A regressive tax is one where the percentage contributed regresses the more you earn.

Perhaps he was out on the piss in Canary Wharf after his dad's funeral?

So the govt is actively suggesting loads of people are dying on thier watch from Covid that actually aren't to make people stay at home and shut things? Yep, I can see how that would increase their popularity and make them look good.

Well, the argument is they're still using the services. And as more and more people get older the system has more and more people to care for with less and less people contributing. They still pay income tax. When it was started the amount you contributed paid for those now and then future...

Claiming it's progressive because there's a LEL under which people don't contribute is a bit of a stretch. Once you start contributing the percentage you pay goes down the more you earn. That makes it regressive.

You were the one that equated higher earnings as people 'bettering themselves'.

You practically accused the government of making up the death statistics as an excuse to bring lockdowns back

No it isn't. It's actually a regressive tax because above a certain level the percentage contributed goes down

Hence a wealth tax amongst other things... 'Better' themselves. So I guess all nurses should fuck off their job and do something that earns more so they can 'better' themsleves. Perhaps they could sell expensive tat to trendy people? Or become an influencer? Richer does not mean better, If...

Not sure why you're so obsessed with thinking this government wants lockdowns. They've consistently left the decision until way too late in order to try and keep things open until the situation has got so bad it's unavoidable. Their donors and mates want things open so they can make more...

Except for all those established business that were ignored for start-ups by Tory mates that either didn't send any equipment at all or stuff that wasn't fit for purpose...