Search results

That's Batshituayi crazy!

But it's replacing one shit option with another shit option. Yes, the carbon crisis might be an immediate problem, but so is nuclear if something goes wrong. Safety is very good, but I work on the idea of cumulative risk. It WILL happen eventually. And the more nuclear plants you build, the...

Well, that's the thing with new ideas and concepts - they don't have any. It requires a leap of faith. What we have now is a clear case study in what doesn't work - if it did we wouldn't be having all these problems with lots of people in one of the richest nations on earth not being able to...

I do not, but if I was looking to run a business I would be looking at doing so along these lines. But nice to see you just resort to trying to change the narrative by asking questions rather than having a debate on the actual ideas outlined.

Owners often make the choice to not extract any interest or put it in as capital, often looking to use it to build and thus get greater returns in dividends later on. If the potential dividend to them was reduced they'd probably choose to take/accrue the interest instead. They have the risk of...

While I've got no idea what is or isn't accurate, it appears Saddle has heard from one source the price is £10m while another supposedly heard it's £6m and the argument is over it being paid up front or in installments. I'm wondering if it's possible they could both be accurate to a degree and...

Normally owned by the owners. Who in most small enterprises tend to be the people who do much, if not all, of the work. So are owner/employees themselves. If they employ a small number of people, often in less senior roles to enable the business to function, As a senior employee they would have...

Care to explain which bits aren't true or plausible? Or is it just a pithy comment because you can't actually argue with the points made but they're different to the failing system you desperately cling to.

Someone should tell them they don't need to stand IN the toilet to take a piss.

If he ends up being injured for much of this season, I think MR will likely let Eccles have his role and hope he can overcome his injury issues. If not, then it may have to be Howley, depending on if the loan window has closed at that time. There is also Allen. Unless we sell Hamer or Sheaf I...

The board of directors and executives, as at every company. Who are chosen by the shareholders, Who in that case would be the employees. So if they try and fuck the employees over by giving low pay rises and/or poor dividends but increase their own wages by a huge amount, those same employees...

Are they the polar opposite of anti-vaxxers?

I'd be adding a couple of million onto the price for the attempt to unsettle. Disrespectful.

This is being stored for if Sunak doesn't win and your blind support of the Tories will see you laud whoever it as as some incredible leader.

Well, clearly not because as I said it's swings and roundabouts. Why take a pay cut to get the money back in dividends? They just won't take any dividends.

Why write my own response when someone's already done it for me.

Keep going - I'm sure your efforts will bear fruit. I'm rooting for you!

I reckon much sooner than that.

Literally Also the same morons who when we have a few days of snow in winter are the first to use it as proof climate change/warming isn't happening.

Might go all Marxist here, but isn't the answer worker co-op's? Then if they decide to give the big pay rise, they get less in dividends. If they don't get a pay rise it's covered by higher dividends. Swings and roundabouts.