Search results

Estufuckingpinan

I get what you mean, it probably falls under the auspices of "not clear and obvious" although I do think it was. Maybe they were deploying a different application of the laws. There was a elbow in the head at some point that looked a bit iffy too. I don't recall fully due to cider!

If we use the pen that we gave away yesterday as a barometer then what Joelinton did can be considered a viscous and brutal assault and can consider himself lucky to not be behind bars.

The foul was blatant to be fair, two straight arms in the back. In other news lol Emi Martinez.

Yep, I liked Eccles when he came on. He moved the ball with a zip and purpose.

More an individual error than anything to do with the formation tbh but you could apply that to a lot of the goals we've conceded. For what it's worth I thought we looked less passive with the back four.

The angle doesn't help, his trailing leg catches him not the leading one, he was going for a block not a tackle I think. In reality he barely touched him.

Arsenal are fighting fire with fire. Newcastle remind me of prime shithousing Athletico Madrid

I can. It was a booking imo.

This, I think double jeopardy only applies when there is a genuine attempt for the ball which there wasn't here so he should have walked, that said the contact was minimal. Fucking stupid thing to do.

Try a VPN or changing browser to something like duck duck go. Zero ads.

This is what we did tail end of last season tbf

The cost of beer.

Wilson-Esbrand scored a peach in Lige 1 for Reims. (Goal just after 2.30 minutes in).

This would be one of the only universally accepted opinions

That looked more of a foul on Haaland than the foul for the pen

Might be, they also have relinquished ownership of their ground I think...

That's our tactic for most of last season tbf

Or left back. I've seen Shef Utd a few times an I'm still unsure what position he actually plays!

This.