Search results

So using your argument about manifesto's mentioning rejoining the EU not being a vote winner, if the public didn't want Maastricht surely at least one of them would have taken the plunge to say they weren't going to do it? So as they all did put it in, every single one must have been confident...

Not happy with what it had become or unhappy at what they perceived/had been led to believe it had become?

Even though it's highly unlikely we'll be getting big fees to spend, even if he let us have a majority of transfer fees that would be a big difference. Also if has been stated no interest is being charged then again that makes a big difference in the balance sheet.

I think the lower areas the view is quite poor as you can't see as much of the game, but you do feel a bit closer to the action. Most expensive bit should be halfway line, around about level with the vomitories. Decent view and much more convenient,

If you do prices for parts of the stadium wouldn't singers corner have to become the most expensive given how it's the one that everyone seems to want to be in? Given it's also the most problematic area extra cost would be spent on the extra stewarding and policing that area requires. Probably...

Don't know all of the games but the ones I attended: Japan Women v Canada Women 14,119 Sweden Women v SA women 18,290 (both games followed each other) GB women v Canada Women 28,828 Canada women v France women (bronze medal) 12,645

Indeed, and I hope he can remain injury free both for his and our sakes. He could be a very useful player over that contract. But it doesn't change the fact that up to now he has regularly suffered injuries and it's not unfair to say offering someone with that record a long term deal is a risk...

His injury record

Not even worth a squad place in Grendel's spreadsheet.

It's more if you play two and O'Hare is fit, who plays. For me as a general rule it's Allen against the better teams and away from home, Palmer against the poorer teams and at home.

As a general rule, yes, but in positions of power both are fucking awful. Basically the question is Truss v Johnson.

Of course he's not going to be totally squeaky clean. Everyone who gets into a position like that has made deals somewhere and owes somebody. Will he be saying shit he doesn't believe because thinktanks/advisors believe it will get votes - of course he will. But to be just as corrupt as...

So you'd think you'd be flat out against the side that started the war by invading the other country. If all wars are bad cos people die and therefore talks and negotiate need to be entered into, all nations should invade all other nations because they will immediately reach a settlement to end...

So in your mind Zelensky is at fault because he won't negotiate with someone who can't be trusted. So the talks would be meaningless. In a later post you also put Russians won't accept defeat and never will. So they're not going to negotiate either. Why are they not to blame for the failure...

Which if could be proven to be true would blow the safety argument of requiring shitloads of netting to separate the two sets of fans out of the water.

A decade later. Like between Crimea and now? Seems like death and destruction has got a bit bigger since then. Not a great advert for the policy that was supposed to placate him and stop any more bloodshed... If you let him carry on what you'll have is a huge population unwillingly living under...

So you talk for them all when you say there should be peace talks? From what I've seen and heard (which admittedly is going to be limited and likely biased) it seems like there's a hell of an appetite for getting Russia to totally fuck off out of there country.

Becomes it becomes subsumed into Putin's Russia. You see that bit on a map that says Russia? And then the bit to the west of it that's called Ukraine? On Putin's map it would all be called Russia. Ukraine would not exist. Putin has repeatedly said that he does not believe it has ever had 'real...

It won't be a country at all if Putin has his way.

Right now, no. His aim is to rebuild the USSR. But imagine he does that. He's going to feel like he has been right all along and in fact the world needs to be taken away from western ideals into Russian ones. And after his success he's clearly the right person to do it. You're really...