Search results

I thought there was the rule where if a third player approaches the referee they are automatically booked. yet there are games where I've seen half the team surrounding him. Surely that should be three or four yellows? But nothing. It would be good if the refs actually followed laws like that...

Only if O'Hare wasn't available. Not sure how well Palmer would work in that sort of formation, because you'd ideally like him to be second choice ahead of Allen but would the pressing be there?

But was that because he didn't start and had the benefit of his fresh legs against tiring ones?

Initially I though his arm was by his side and the ball would have hit his side anyway. But replay showed arm was extended from the body and definite pen and red.

After his second red I did think his value would be lower than it should be, say around £3m. Since then he's been phenomenal and those that were talking of £8m aren't looking quite so silly.

I'd probably go back to 1 up top and play Sheaf, Eccles, Hamer and O'Hare. Not quite in a box though. Sheaf and Eccles as holding midfielders, O'Hare AM and Hamer drifting around inbetween. Palmer and Allen on the bench

Last game seemed to work ok with Vic and Walker starting and Godden off the bench. Keep it that for now.

I guess the fear that Putin would go nuclear if anyone tried to stop him is about to be tested. Wonder if he might end up being defenestrated in the not too distant future?

Meanwhile Jamie Allen is still free to roam the streets

Very sorry but that doesn't rhyme. it was chim-chim-cheroo

@Kieranp96 might be interested.

Wilson McNally Fadz Doyle Bidwell Dabo Sheaf Eccles Hamer Maguire Gyokeres Moore, Panzo, Burroughs, JWE, BNC, Godden, Walker Gone for Maguire because I think he's the most likely to be able to either play next to Vic or drop a bit deeper. If it didn't work out I'd give Walker a chance ahead of...

I blame it on the weatherman.

None seem to have cottoned on to the fact that Brady was never the highest paid QB and so the team had money to buy him protection/targets. And he's still incredibly rich. I think a fair few need to consider whether their motivation is money or championships.

I think that last paragraph doesn't do you any favours. You saying legislation doesn't mean a lot. Of course it does. It means everything. If you don't follow the legislation then the ground doesn't get a safety certificate. Then no-one's standing. Or sitting. So if the rules say you can only...

Sadly I think you're right. If you want something done about it you have to make sure it gets aired outside of the school hierarchy, who will attempt to hush it up if at all possible. But then we're into the realms of social media and the possibility of false allegations ruining innocent...

I quite liked him, even though he didn't have the impact we'd have liked. An ex of mine REALLY loved him! Her favourite city player of all time, though I feel pretty certain thats not due to what he achieved on the pitch! Is he still the U.S. record cap holder?

I want to give this both a like and sad reaction. Why do people and organisations never look to the long term? They'd be afraid of the inspection, money etc if they exclude the student, but how bad would the inspection etc be if being lenient led to another incident? Or two? or three? You nip...

This must immensely traumatic for the girl in question and no-one should be put through something like that. On the whole I've suggested individual cubicles as a solution to the safety vs identity dilemma but I was mainly considering it in adult spaces rather than schools. With schools I can...

People that do that undermine their own opinion because it shows bias and therefore their judgement could be clouded. Same with Not-On-Coffee. He's not been great but just by having that go at him you think the poster is looking to find fault.