Search results

Because no one has said there will be anyway of not "taking a risk" it's about not choosing to live where you increase that risk. Do you have the figures to back up your case as frankly it isn't passing muster at the moment.

if we do play wing backs today, it is not because we are switching to it but to see if it is still a valid alternative option

You haven't explain why and what evidence you have that illegal immigrants are likely to choose to but themselves at risk of capture. No one said anything about "iron walls", no one is saying you can't get in an immigration hotel. The question is why would they choose to if it increases the...

You want people to be "polite" yet get cunty when it's pointed out what you are saying makes no sense. Please explain to me why if an illegal immigrant you wants to blend in and melt into society is going to choose to live in a place that makes it more likely that they get caught? Yes you can...

No, but they can easily turn up and lift anyone who isn't meant to be there. Stop with the personal insults and explain why you think it is likely that illegal immigrants are going to live in a place where it is very, very easy for them to be arrested? Your argue fails the "making sense" check.

No, not on any real scale because as I said they want to be as far away from somewhere the Border Authorities will check. The vast, vast majority live in things HMO's etc.

Also if you are an illegal undocumented migrant you are not going to hang around where the current version of Border Force normally are.

They check who comes in and out, still if you can't talk without being abusive when you are wrong then so be it

No, it's impossible for someone who the government is paying to house and feed to be not know by the government thus they are part of of the immigration system. It's not rocket science Nick.

How would the someone be housed and fed an official immigration hotel if they were not part of the immigration system? Genuine question because it's impossible. We have an obligation under international law not to let failed asylum seekers starve, why is it wrong that we do this until they are...

Asylum seekers aren't illegal immigrants.

Also the "immigration" hotels are a symptom of an underfunded immigration system and the backlog it created. And as said "illegal" immigrants get fuck all as they are the ones who aren't in the system.

show me a post of mine that proves that, go on I dare you

There's a difference though isn't there, we are talking specifically about stamping on someone's head when they are defenceless. Let's keep this truthful and not bring any strawmen into it. Who apart from the EDL fella and yourself has stated that they would think it is okay to stamp on a...

You think defenceless people deserve to have their heads stamped on? Figures

Mate, you have jumped the shark. In your attempts to same side racism and bigotry you are accusing people of thinks they don't support

Yes, no one thinks it's okay to stamp on defenceless peoples heads apart from you and the EDL clowns.

No, no they wouldn't think it was okay. I for one wouldn't and have said so many times. Why are you continuing with this lie?

shame he can't form a very meh partnership with fellow overrated by SBT star Yates now

especially one that has got a failed ex gb news presenter fronting their head wasp shite