Search results

I wouldn't be doubting his ability. Once fit (could take a while) I'm sure he'd be a very good player and likely better than what we've got currently. Would I want us to take the risk on him? No.

Brooks - managed to get some ones that were like 120 quid for 70 a few years ago because they are in awful colours haha. Bit on the heavy side but the cushioning is decent and I run mainly on the roads

And neither would I. What's a few headbutts amongst friends eh.

Gnads?

You were not bothered about Drinkwater's imbecilic behaviour either. In fact you said "so what?" - this is why I mentioned it. Hope that helps clarify things for you.

Oh okay, sound then, sign him up. He's only 40 now. I hated that we signed him and he did relatively okay.

He was convicted of sexual assault... among other things that is. Are you his lawyer or something?!

We can't be two of them.

People would be "weak" for getting annoyed at someone else, or thinking they are a ***? Okay. Yes bin them. Bin any of the players that have normal human emotions for that matter and let's have a team of Ostigards 🤣

So... it kind of suggests he likes a beer, is a bit of a wrong-un and may upset some of the other players.

I think this is fair comment, I think I prefer "good" Shipley to Thomas, however, you know what you get when you bring Thomas on.

They said the top five players. Shipley is number 6 in the list...

So has COH now 🤷‍♂️ I liked Luke Thomas when he was here and he was definitely a hard worker, I don't think that's the kind of player we need though. Another short, technically good attacking player, who struggles with his final ball / finishing.

Was renowed for his end product when he played with us...

Please tell me this was a serious suggestion, it makes it funnier

Wilson's confidence, the defences confidence, the way they play, whether other players feel their place is under threat. I'm not saying it will and I'm certainly not saying we shouldn't give Lee Camp a go, as Wilson's made a few errors. I'm just explaining there are factors outside of "Lee Camp...

6ft 2 is not in reference to his height...

9/10th's of £100k 🤣

The difference may well be negligible and I'm fairly sure it's not the choice of signing Lee Camp (possibly even on a pay to play deal?) or a guaranteed 20 goal a season championship striker. Also, it's not just as simple as "Lee Camp isn't as good" is it? That's the point I'm trying to make...

How much did we spend out of interest?