Search results

Bit of backbone, Dildo. Read properly next time.

I, and many others with a bit of backbone, support the NOPM campaign on the pure point of principle of our club no longer playing 'home' games within the boundaries of the city of Coventry.

It could be that all of SISU's eggs are in the one basket (Obtaining the Ricoh). This ain't gonna happen. Could be wrong, but I think I hear the sound of creaking noises coming from the organisation given some of their recent activities (This post's subject, advertising for fans due to Timmy's...

Classic.

That's it Fellas, the marble count must be close to zero by now....

Just for the sake of putting a point across, I'll respond. Don't normally to your posts as you are obviously on the hedge fund payroll. Anyways, Ken Bates would of got out a damn sight quicker if he had moved Leeds to say, Harrogate, half way through his tenure there.

Often disagree with both you and Paxman 2 on issues debated in this forum, however recognized your views as those of a genuine Cov fan. The above comment, and the one Paxman has made are seriously damaging your credibility though. For fucks sake, put your shovels down!

What is obvious is the investors aren't prepared to part with their cash to invest in either players that would of kept us in the championship, or to pay for a half share in a Football stadium/leisure complex, so what good are they to us as owners?

Yes... I think all of this can be considered a marvellous success.... as we hurtle toward league 2, playing 'home' games 35 miles away......

Get some perspective Tone! This, by comparison is a thread with many views, however, of the 5000 or so views only a minutae are posting and only a portion of those are actually in favour or wavering regarding attendance at Northants. I'm a native of Cov, in the real world as opposed to this...

Saga? 3 league games in is a Saga? News to me that SISU have proved they can fund 'all of this including a stadium', the slightly contentious matter of obtaining planning permission for this fallacy notwithstanding. Massively disappointed given your previous stance.

It was good because it prevented the corporate Pirates we know as SISU/Otium from getting any sniff of obtaining the Ricoh. Who said anything about haggling anyway?

Agree with much of what you say, although don't think they have any interest in CCFC whatsoever any more, it's all about obtaining the Ricoh. They obviously appointed Ranson as their footballing mastermind, but he failed miserably with his disastrous managerial appointments. I think after they...

Nothing to do with the CVA? So ACL should just shut up and accept any old derisory offer? Thousands, including a High court Judge would appear to disagree...

A perfectly reasonable request, given SISU owed them in excess of £1m in unpaid rent.

Why should ACL be held to ransom by a SISU leaning administrator.

Because the terms and conditions were clearly unacceptable.

Laughable...they threatened it, we are still subject to it....

Incompetence and spite.

Nonetheless, I still think it's a practice SISU have engaged in to blatantly conceal what's been received/outlayed. Still think the other aspects to my original argument hold plenty of water too. Anyways, off to bed....