Search results

Have we ruled out the possibility of chronologically meaning by age...?

Maybe, but still ideological. Money is still going out of government funds and ending up in private hands with split interests rather than a body whose sole concern is providing social housing.

Well, yes of course it matters how things used to be. That's how we learn and don't make the same mistakes when we do what we do today. And for me that means giving a honest account of what went on. Yes, we can show all the great things that came about because of empire, and the inventions and...

But some of that disease was knowingly and willing introduced into the native population to reduce their numbers, and undoubtedly killed a huge number of people, probably in the millions. That today would be considered biological warfare and mass genocide.

Seems odd that a council wouldn't qualify for a grant but a private association does. Almost like it's policy to make it easier for private investors to make money at the expense of those in need of housing and its communities

I feel like the sell off should have been limited to 50% of a property. Council retains the land/property as well as a decent amount of control over repairs/tenants etc. Renter can obtain equity and then have a vested interest to keep the house/area maintained.

OR... they could just mic the refs up so they explain the decision in real time to the fans in the stadium who've paid to be there.

Those are valid discussion points, but have nothing to do with him being able to play 90mins or not.

I heard they weren't sure if he was going to be fit, and were going to call up his dad as a Last Resort

Why did the Proclaimers cancel, given they say they'd walk 500 miles?

Why the obsession with being able to do 90mins? There are these things called subs. If someone is a supersub that bangs in goals do you write them off because they don't do it for 90mins? People's natural athleticism differs from person to person and no matter how hard they try their aerobic...

FORWARD! Having the three of them on together towards the end if we're chasing a game, maybe. Starting together - not for me. For a start I think Godden and Simms both want to be the player in the box getting chances and you can't have two of that type of forward on together. As for the thing...

Those people will have a choice. Be near the away fans and sit down, or stay in the corner and stand.

Would entirely depend on how they do during the previous game. MR is reluctant to make changes to a winning team, so if we do that it'll likely stay the same, or if the defence keeps a clean sheet. Even if the individuals play well but concede one I think MR would keep it the same.

Or decided to follow one of the random rumours on social media to cause a stir.

Well the only real difference in that respect is Eccles out and Ayari in. Even though Ayari came on in place of Palmer last time I think he's capable of playing a bit deeper, like Hamer used to. Having Eccles and Sheaf together at home seems a little bit negative and we really struggled to...

TBF he has bigged up youngsters before. Bapaga, anyone? I watched a few U18/U21 matches last year and none of these seemed anywhere near ready to step up to first team duties yet. Not saying they won't eventually, but they've got a lot to do to get there IMO.

I think hitting the pedestrian would be a bigger worry than running the red light!

Ooh, what do I win?!