Search results

No, we aren't. When this sort of shit happens season in season out then it's likely because we're managing the workloads wrong. We consistently have small squads so the chances of players having to play lots of minutes increases. We have a manager reluctant to make subs so those players play...

So who's the RB? We've got more people who at a push can play RWB than RB.

LWB, or not LWB? That is the question.

Well, yes, there are options but all square pegs in round holes. If I only had one fork and broke it, there plenty of ways i could transfer food from a plate into my mouth. My fingers, a knife, I could even get my gardening hand fork out and literally have a stab at it. None of them are...

But part of that exposure was because the men were also playing it. If the Hundred had just been for female teams it wouldn't have got anywhere near the same coverage.

So the plan is to pass it from side to side, but more quickly.

It's pretty much the definition of a cartel.

I was hoping Ayari could play a slightly deeper role, but he looked lost when he was tried there before. Maybe with a bit more training and familiarity he can adapt to play there.

You got a flatulence problem?

And we expected things from Hamer and Gyokeres when we signed them for that kind of money. Just because we went mad spending this year after a windfall doesn't mean we shouldn't have expectations for that cash. We're not suddenly some cash-rich club that can afford the odd expensive flop. If...

But doesn't sound like he's exactly going into detail either.

Godden and Simms weren't working either. They both want to play the same role.

Before we signed Wright we were looking at Simms as an expensive signing and were surprised we'd paid that much for a player. Just because we've since spent almost silly money on other players doesn't mean Simms shouldn't have decent expectations placed on him. He was brought in as a major part...

You'd think they'd at least say what we should be looking to pay and advise not to proceed if it's too high.

If we play the box and the extra midfielder then it's less of an issue IMO. As I've said it does create the problem of who to play as the lone striker. I wouldn't be averse to trying one DCM but think we may be a bit too exposed doing that. Back four isn't an option IMO as the wingbacks don't...

Doubt the hundred would continue working for the women if the men aren't playing it.

I'm not saying that will happen, certainly not after MR's comments. I was just thinking that at home against Huddersfield we should be looking to get at them, and having Eccles at RWB isn't going to do that. I guess we could just play Kelly as a single DCM and have Ayari and Saka as two ACM's

Are you suggesting we've spent £20m on players he doesn't?

Watford will push that assessment to the limit.