Search results

I’m not denying any of that. It’s the moral outrage that I’m getting at. I don’t care if you like GB News or not. Like I said I don’t have strong views either way. It’s the idea that it’s morally wrong to deal with them, but fine to deal with organisations that have done horrific things

It was just over 10 years ago

No you’re right I don’t get it. Please explain why it’s morally wrong to deal with a media outlet that has an “agenda” like you claim, but it’s morally fine to deal with one that covered up child sexual abuses

😂😂😂😂

See this is what I find confusing, and concerning. GB news is morally reprehensible for breaching Offcom rules. BBC is morally sound despite covering up violent child sexual abuse. Me thinks a fair few on here are allowing their political allegiances to cloud their moral judgment

The same Sky & BBC that have “independent experts” on who then turn out to be active members of a political party?

It’s Keir Starmer that called him a racist, not the Mail

Sky gave a platform to known racist Jeremy Corbyn. Do you refuse to watch Sky as well?

As I posted previously, please give me an example of a media outlet that doesn’t promote division. Just one. As for Saville, it’s only about 10 years since the BBC were denying any wrongdoing. Fans are happy to cosy up to an organisation that covered up the most horrific of crimes. Whatever...

Football attendances across the board are at their highest levels since the 50s. Comparing us potentially being in the PL next season to us in the 90s isn’t a fair comparison. The PL clubs currently selling out every week also do not have a history of doing that

Luton have clearly been the better team over the 46 game season. However I suppose the question is what relevance do games played last August have on ability now?

Why? All Premier League grounds are at least 90% full on average. There is no reason at all to assume we would be any different. As I've said before, as a group of fans we are not special. We're no different to any other supporters.

I just think that as a fan representative you should be a bit more professional in airing your personal views. Just because you have the right to say something doesn’t always mean it’s wise to do so

Yes, and acknowledge that everyone is entitled to their views without ridicule and slanderous remarks

I just find it bizarre that you don’t want our club linked to a media outlet because you personally disagree with some of the presenters views, but quite happy for it to be linked to a media outlet that spent decades covering up horrific child sexual abuse.

I can’t see them doing that. It would be a PR disaster

I can almost understand that type of football snobbery with fans who support a club that have been in the top flight for 20 years, but wolves have only been up there themselves for 5 minutes.

I think it’s email. Not sure what happens if you don’t own a printer

Would it not be worse? The inevitable pasting ever other week?

What a strange thing to say. So using that logic, Sky News has an angle that is closer to those of the Chinese Communist Party than other political movements? As for the trust pulling it being an indication that the majority of fan’s support pulling it, is that an omission that the opinions...