Search results

A hairdresser can also be an investment business If he is not cutting hair he is not a trading hairdresser If he rents out spare chairs ancilliary to being a haidresser then he is probably still a hairdresser Does this apply to you ? It of course does not constitute advice and you would need...

If I knew that I would be a High Court Judge and make lots of money

It rents out the buildings and facilities of the "Ricoh" - what do you think it does and gets it's income If the sole activity of the Hairdresser is to simply provide rented chairs he certainly is not a trading business You might like to read...

They might interpret them differently !! Thats why we have a judicial system of many tiers otherwise we might just as well only have JP's

Well one is the highest court in the land and the other isn't

What else is it? It owns property and rents it - looks very much like an investment company to me

The Council's agreement will be caveated with proof of funds and their source ( or should be ) It may be a known risk but an unknown result

They have also courted Northampton and London Welsh - in fact anyone who might come WASPS have also "courted" Oxford and Stevenage Means nothing!

It is not inane I have not said they will overturn the past results - that is only your reading - I am saying it will be a totally different scenario in front of 3 High Court Judges.

You are deluded

There are several parties who buy investment companies ( ie ACL ) but they no longer pay silly prices

I have asked this several times before - if it going "cheap" why should it only be SISU who can bid for it? You do not know what the WASPS offer is yet - and they certainly do not have the money they need

Excuse me but did not the previous owners take the Club to the point of liquidation ??

They are by no way the worst owners in my time You say "other parties" - are there more? You say a cheap deal - it is an investment property the value of which can be calculated. It is only worth more than that if you have a specific purpose which will enhance its value. If it is a "cheap deal...

And agreed to the sale of Highfield Road and bypassed all the covenants

I did say as a business they are waiting to see the outcome of WASPs approach = even if WASPs offer is accepted they could still top it. Then what would happen? I assume they feel the JR is still due in their favour - if CCC are as equally confident why should they worry? It is a side issue and...

At this level they should alrerady have proof of funding

The Council could actually come out and say we are prepared to sell to CCFC and the base line figure per our valuations is £x

I have not said that I have put forward a suggestion as to why the Council are in a rush. I do not see any other reason - do you?