Search results

He's not saying that at all. That's what he's saying in your head. What he's said is that we don't live in a country where a few disgruntled people with an axe to grind can get a few signatures and we call a GE. Imagine if we did. We'd never get to the point of having a govt. Let's say we had a...

You might say we're not playing to his strengths. I'd argue he's not playing to his strengths either. I would genuinely consider giving him an U21 to fill his boots and try and get his confidence up. Never known a player who is so absolutely reliant on their mental state.

Look at it another way. There are plenty of people in the demographics Starmer seems to be bending over backwards to placate that want to see a charge made. For these men to be charged would be seen as a win for him at the moment.

He was never staying no matter how much we offered. If he got a chance of PL football he was going regardless.

Must be pretty simple for opposition managers. Just tell their team to be tight at the back and we will at some point give them a couple of chances to score.

Very disappointing. We gave them far too much respect. And it's impossible to work this team out. Capable of putting in a good performance with attacking intent then just not looked arsed a few days later.

When the PM changes it's effectively a new govt as they change all the ministers and Truss completely and utterly changed the policies the govt were elected under. No-one may have voted but it's a new govt.

That's that then. Back to speculating about the new manager

Shame for EMC. That could have been the moment that ignited his CCFC career.

Definitely need some changes. EMC, Simms and Rudoni on. Sakamoto, Torp and pobably Lati off.

You really are windmilling aren't you. Nowhere are those two statements contradictory. He did not say that he would allow a GE if a small number of people signed a petition asking for one. Neither does he say he's ignoring those non Labour voters - the fact he's talking about it is proof he's...

I quite like the idea of someone unknown. But the main think I get from the post is there's a guy who's basically called Regis the Circumcised.

I've thought recently why don't one of the opposition players stand there literally counting it down? Ref can't ignore it then surely.

I'm not disagreeing with you on what number he should be in this hypothetical 1-11. I'm saying he literally was 8. For years. Though I will be controversial in saying I never liked having the 4 as a midfielder with 5 and 6 as defenders. I preferred 4 as a CB and 6 as a midfielder.

Maybe. But you said in the old days with 1-11 he'd be 4. He had no 8 for years which, last time I checked, was between 1 and 11.

He literally had the No. 8

Going to be difficult but think we could snatch a draw. However, I've got a sneaking suspicion Norman is going to get sent off, so we'll probably lose.

Working within the structure isn't the same as working with the personnel in that structure. Could have been some differences in understanding?

So your argument that Labour having 20% is no mandate from the people, but 26% is fine. And a petition with less than 5% of voters (and we can't verify all those signatories are genuine) should be enough for a discussion to have another general election. It's all over the place. The only thing...