Would that mean Richardson is paid off and has nothing else to do with the stadium. Would the 40% effectively pay him back what he's put in and he walks away for good
It shouldn't be down to the football club though, I don't know any other club in the country where the local council want the club to carry out regeneration, its not their responsibility.
You could say they won't fund it without stadium ownership, still not responsible whoever owns the ground to do CCC work for them in building hotels, hospitals, warehouses etc, this should be nothing to do with the football club
Why is it the priority according to the CCC that any potential football club owners should also be regenerating the land around the stadium. No other club owners in the country have this problem. This should surely be done by other external investment while the football club owners concentrate...