Search results

How would a party obtain preferred bidder status?

What’s their route out though? As others have said they won’t crystallise a loss so they will bleed us slowly with interest on loans.

He’d be crazy to do the stadium deal first without a plan for the club. Either he has an agreement with SISU or he really hasn’t had any contact with them yet which means a years long standoff between MA and SISU.

I hope you’re right but as we know multiple parties will act irrationally when it comes to CCFC inevitably making the clubs life more difficult.

That’s something I guess but we plod along for another 8 years until lease is up then arguments start afresh

Have you heard something or is this speculation?

If he thinks he can make money from the complex regardless will he care?

Hats off to whoever text in to say that as Eccles is doing a job at RB we can give Dabo a go in midfield.

The only thing is you have to wade through a load of puns and arguments that have been going on for 10 years. And Julian Gray updates

I want to believe the club wouldn’t keep paying this extra money unless they knew safety was just around the corner but I guess they have no other choice really?

I was born in the old Leamington hospital. Once the brakes are in the champions league I’ll be ditching CCFC quicker than if you gave me a plastic wasps flag.

Indeed but possibly not at this time which could be why there are rumours he isn’t

It could be very long winded. Would there not be other clubs where the process would be a lot quicker? Champ is full of big clubs who could go to the prem with the right investment.

To who? I had a look at the paragraph you mentioned but I don’t understand it. Is it tying wasps to the CBS or forcing ACL to host wasps? I’m guessing the latter as it’s in the bond prospectus?

I can see now why some feel they’d be the worst option. No interest in the club, we’re tenants again with none of our long green issues solved. Groundhog Day.

Damn, 276 pages, you can see how investors were roped in

They’ve got their best man on the case, I’m sure.

Would an agnostic 3rd party like the NEC have them as a tenant with only one stand open or something?

You’d think NEC will want to maximise revenue and would look to increase when current deal expires.

What would the administrator take into account when assessing bids? Would it purely be the highest bid and best return for creditors? Would they consider best for the local area and each tenant at the arena. We’re biased thinking club and ground should be united but does any other party involved...