Search results

https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/kaine-kesler-hayden/leistungsdatendetails/spieler/626888/wettbewerb/GB2 This site counts LWB as LM so it looks 36 games as a RB or RWB and 21 games as a LWB or LB. Still feel we are moving MVE on, but that's okay as it's what we have to do.

If we do keep MVE (doubt we will but KKH is a very good replacement and to be up on the whole deal is great) then KKH is also a very good lb as well.

the duke of york was there?

not having a player with hair that bad

I mean we were seemingly offered 10m in Jan. We'll get 10m or more if he goes this summer.

You mean apart from the case that one of them is out on bail for?

I should like kneecap but they are just shite

that's because most of you can't spell coventry

oggy

And as I said Liberal judges are the ones who will do that when related to constitution as written. All their verdicts are available online if you'd like to see.

yes, but there more promising signs than their were last season.

nah, I see it happening The issue with conservative judges is they see the constitution as set in stone. It's actually the liberal judges that have historically been the ones to "bend" the constitution to suit their needs.

Forgive me if I am wrong but the season before last during the bad start there were games were we played really well but missed loads of chances and gave away stupid goals last season we were just urgh

it's going to happen, this court has basically cheapened itself that much be interesting to see what trump tries to do as well because the oldest judges now are right wing

they can't, not without either a constitutional convention or over 2/3s of states and legislators agreeing to change anything they would need democrat backing

interestingly there's not an actual "fixed" amount of SC judges so you may as they get younger see the amount change with every new part in power

yeah but over constitutional issues they don't always vote the way you think they will that the case that brought this over birth right citizenship, it is clearly defined in the constitution that all people born (outside of some things such as to foreign diplomats) are automatically us citizens...

The SC would then decide, it's what it is there for.

The courts can still block state wide or so it seems to read The actual case at hand over birth right citizenship is actually likely to be struck down by the SC anyway as it is clearly against the constitution and so my so even they can't fudge it,

anyway, as stated happy to see him sign for anyone as long as we get our cut