Search results

I guess it depends what you're looking for. If you want reasoned analysis of what SISU are up to, Oldskyblue58 is hard to beat. If you want surreal comments Bobby Peru is hard to beat. Sadly both have too many posters who confuse repetition with some form of insight or (God forbid) wit.

GMK is different. Sometimes witty, sometimes insightful, sometimes surreal, sometimes tedious - often with a tenuous connection to the supposed subject matter.

Read through your post again - any words missing perhaps?????

Have to assume that this post was intended to be ironic.......

Bet he couldn't keep the promise though.........

Are you a different USSkyblue to the one on GMK, as he often seemed to be quite intelligent?

Maybe the saved wages on the various departures will go some way towards it. Just a thought.........

So you are honestly suggesting that they would provide the funding but would allow themselves to be outvoted at the Board. If so, then they are even more stupid than I thought.

And all that time the nice people at SISU (who,after all, controlled the club) had no idea what was going on..............

You really ought to take more interest then. There are some who think that he should pay SISU back a significant chunk of their "investment", but I don't think there's anyone who seroiously doesn't think "he was interested in the first place".

Another of those unknowingly ironic posts about Thorn being able to "avoid any blame" in a series of threads and posts blaming Thorn.

That's just stupid! You think he'd be allowed to have 15............

No need to worry - everyone is working hard to get the embargo lifted!!

No use using logic MMM. A number of our distinguished posters have decreed that he is the worst manager of all time in the entire universe and some of them have watched City for 25 years (bloody youngsters) so how can they be argued with ?

You are Joy and I claim my £5!!

When Ken left!

How dare you suggest they have a plan. They could sue for that sort of libel!

If there was to be a bid (who knows with paper talk), I guess it's much more likely to be based on his appearances for the youth team.

So just to be clear - you're advocating that when interviewed (which we both agree he has little choice in agreeing to), he should "spout some bollocks" and that this will make things better!! Personally I think that most of these "page filler" interviews are already full of "bollocks" and I...

Bit confused...... You said "wish he'd say nothing" I said " don't think he can really say nothing" You said " of course he could, he could say .........." Did they change the meaning of nothing when I wasn't looking?