Search results

It depends what figure was used in the first assumption

There is already a design to fit 25,000 if needed - and planning available already exists for an additional 12000 on top of existing

It already has outline planning for 15000

But they did not have a qualified independent valuer as promised for the last accounts

Wasn't that obvious to those before him?

The first 2 years of "interest" was paid by the original investors themselves A sum was set aside from the initial funding to make the payments Until the investors sell their bonds or they are repaid they have actually not received those 2 years interest payments

Never had a pint of anything with Tim Fisher

Can the Council afford to fund them? Any way at the Council meeting approving the sale to WASPS, Lucas said WASP's would develop an Academy THERE not at Higgs

Win or lose I bet WASPS would not want to be dragged into them Why make up things I have not said ?

You need to read up on the Court's current thinking on Mediations.

I did not mention legal costs and their avoidance by going to Butts and the article says "It is understood the Football League, Coventry City Council, and the football club’s parent company Sisu have agreed to take part in the process."

Better the optimist be !

I have simply said that entering discussions to stop legal wranglings must be a good thing for WASPs ( if they are intended to be involved in such ) I assume you disagree?

Let me put it in a more positive light - it doesn't tell me the opposite

How do you come to that from what I said?

It says - not sure if WASPS are involved doesnt it. We will have to wait for their chief correspondent - Simon to tell us !

Ermmm .. maybe Perhaps it is?

And continuing to do so! What Hitler started this Council is bent on completing!

And? Surely it must meet their approval if they can avoid any legal or other disputes

It says Coventry City has already taken part in preliminary discussions - doesn't say what the Council are doing