Search results

  1. O

    Ricoh

    This did not preclude them for putting the stadium out to the general market with an option to have an extended lease. It was a "done deal" so the questions must be asked as to why ?
  2. O

    Ricoh

    CCC gave an ( verbal ) undertaking to Steve Waggott that they would not sell to WASPs before he signed the return lease agreement
  3. O

    Ricoh

    How would that affect the EU funding used to develop the site ? Can I put a complaint in now?
  4. O

    Ricoh

    It was not an open buyers market as CCC set out not to sell to CCFC It has been accepted ( ? ) the purchase price for the stadium on a very short lease was correct The "cheap|" element was the lease extension of £1m for a 200 year extension The argument being then there was only one buyer -...
  5. O

    St Andrews confirmed!

    If the definition of being "good" is a WASP , I am quite pleased to be "bad" !
  6. O

    St Andrews confirmed!

    From: Skinner, David (Cllr) < [email protected]> Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2019, 15:40 Subject: Council statement on CCFC announcement To: Skinner, David (Cllr) < [email protected]> For Residents I forward verbatim today’s joint statement. Please tell anyone who may wish to...
  7. O

    St Andrews confirmed!

    Can I ask what accountancy qualification you have ??
  8. O

    St Andrews confirmed!

    What ever happens to the football club and the EU it stlll seems likely we are stuck with this ruinous Council !
  9. O

    St Andrews confirmed!

    It is Vodaphone now ! But the idea is right
  10. O

    St Andrews confirmed!

    It also means the Council legal team kept it to themselves ?
  11. O

    St Andrews confirmed!

    They cannot really because they all voted for the WASPs sale - probably all worried about being impeached or what the correct term is
  12. O

    St Andrews confirmed!

    Precisely !
  13. O

    St Andrews confirmed!

    But the complaint was not against WASPs - it is CCC. So I wonder which other parties expect to get indemnified ?? CCC??? So the EU find against CCC > CCC demands from WASPs the damages >WASPs then expect SISU/CCFC to cover the lot Yeah right !
  14. O

    St Andrews confirmed!

    Nothing to do with the rent - the statement says they expected CCFC to be included in paying any sums suffered by WASPs ( and their associated parties )
  15. O

    A word to the wise, Mr Hoffman

    Always the Trust?
  16. O

    Club Statement regarding EFL vote and stadium situation

    He would have to right twice then !
  17. O

    11 supporters banned from grounds after Sunderland / Coventry disorder

    Angelic? Check last years figures https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/756379/football-related-arrests-banning-orders-1718-hosb2818.pdf
  18. O

    Club Statement regarding EFL vote and stadium situation

    Statutory Accounts - March 2020 The Guarantors and ACL2006 undertake that they will together require the Independent Appraiser and/or Valuers, as applicable, to produce a Valuation of all Relevant Assets for the purposes of Condition 4(e)(i): (x) not less than once in each consecutive 24 month...
  19. O

    Bright Enobakhare

    And if it turns out to be correct what will they be then - or you in fact?
  20. O

    Club Statement regarding EFL vote and stadium situation

    I know - I was only being a bit silly myself lol We do not how many people own the bonds and I assume you mean over the "borrower" If WASPs Finance defaults then the remedy will be, they can appoint a Receiver who will go for recovery against WASPs Ltd I have not seen the loan document but...
Top