Search results

It is not the same as was intended though is it? Also the Council do not want the small traders and shops Rent increases of 40% plus to long standing tenants then when they move they double that because food outlets command more Disgraceful they way they have let this decline

Have you been in Spon Street lately? Fast food takeaways, drug dealers and a Sheesha outlet complete with plastic palm trees (dont ask how they got planning ) very little medieval left ' best removed

I'm a true Coventrian born in City walls at Gulson Hospital and nothing that Clown says represents me!

OSB may have a view but I wonder If they just took interest instead of reducing loans. Broad as it is long to Otium / SBSL I think

The prior year shows £nil

The SBSL cash flow shows a total interest paid figure of £1.477906 but have not done the sums to see how much is internal funding

What you reckon they are for Nick and Shmmeee? :emoji_briefcase::emoji_busts_in_silhouette:

Property companies do this for every new development - have done for years. So check your NHBC certifcate and warranties closely :-)

The business language is OpCo - PropCo You keep the major assets in a less risky company (PropCo) and the day to day trading in OpCo Standard practice these days

He said "he could not see it lasting in the league" and could drop to the bottom ( dare not think where that is in Southend!)

Was told by a Southend supporter he thinks they are gone. All players of any value have been sold Apparantly the stands etc need a lot of attention and thus cost The ground has planning permission for development so that may have to be sold

I suspect the money came from the CVC deal - it was intended for club development and not paying old debts etc The fact they could use the money to buy a needed training ground and thus free up other funds does not seem to have occurred to anyone

Yet again you have chosen to either not understand or ignore what I have written and cloud your response with obfuscation

The answer to your main point is people are not happy being out of Coventry However they are also not happy at the way the Council have dealt with this matter and in particular they way the sale was conducted You are entitled to defend the latter if that is you wish but do not cojoin the two

what the hell are pod people?

The former is the leader of the mess of Coventry City Council who are supposed to represent 370,000 residents of the City The latter is the leader of a football club representing X number of part time supporters

They also said Eastwood did not believe JVS would talk to them If she did he would organise a meeting with Richardson Has he?

The infamous Bristol City match that took place 40 years ago today This is the Bristolians view