Search results

Yeah and they clearly prepare for it.

I’m not claiming it doesn’t or that I have!

Nobody is saying it’s for no reason. It just comes across a bit ill thought out if it hadn’t been discussed/trained previously. The overall criticism about Robins and subs/tactics is not having a plan B and this still looks that way. Yes, sometimes you need to play a player out of position but...

Yes true but we’re bored waiting for the new manager and just speculating based on a morsel of gossip.

Disingenuous. The criticism was he didn’t change the system/setup/tactics during the game. Player a player out of position is not that, it just seems a bit random. Ok, it worked when we were in possession and attacking but then Rudoni wasn’t having to defend.

You’ve left out the wider context again

It’s perfectly fine to make a decision in the moment. It’s not perfectly fine to then say you’d been thinking about it for a while when the player had no awareness of it as it’s suggests it may well be bollocks.

I don’t know sounds like it was a decision made in the moment by MR which went well then he tried to further justify it by saying he’d been thinking about it for a while.

Yeah obviously I’m joking…

He did post match.

Feel this is more controversial that the Robins sacking

I’m sure at the time I was saying he had a bit about him and felt like I was in the minority, so yeah.

This might be a minority view but I don’t actually care that much as it’s very hard to tell how any manager will do in a specific situation.

Sorry I meant of the video. I realise tl:dr wasn’t the correct term and confusing!

Shame new show has reviewed badly Can someone do a tl:dr for those of us working?

Does anyone else get the feeling we will have a third manager before the season is out?

When asked how long he’d been thinking about it King implied it had been something brewing for a while and specifically mentioned a meeting on Oct 30th which sounded like things came to a head. So it’s reasonable to assume 2 weeks before that he had the idea in the back of his mind. I’m not sure...

A lot will depend on what happens next but is it worth asking for clarifying comments on the difficulty of Robins hiring a number 2?

I can’t. If someone sees “performance” in her job title and then links that directly to performance on the pitch I have difficulty understanding how someone with such simplistic thinking functions. Yes she’s going to help players reach peak performance and fitness through various avenues but...

Yeah the manager is a much bigger variable for one. It’s unlikely the players eating healthier is going to cause a drop off in form