Search results

  1. D

    Weaning myself off Coventry City

    Yeah, in spite of our best intentions you just can't wash a club out of your hair......
  2. D

    Anger/discontent with Pressley?

    Which is why 2 years would have been sensible.
  3. D

    Anger/discontent with Pressley?

    It'd not be so bad 'cept the clowns that run the club gave him 3.5 years.
  4. D

    Weaning myself off Coventry City

    Procdoc, there's no "real fan" definition. Supporters of a F.C. are a broad church. How can it be otherwise? Anyway, you're doing the right thing, for sure.
  5. D

    Weaning myself off Coventry City

    Got a mate who's a lifelong Arse supporter. A couple of years ago they were in a Champions League final and he was praying they'd win.....not for the obvious reason tho' but so he could give up going.....knowing they'd done it all. Poor bugger. It was something I could identify with because I...
  6. D

    GOD loves the CITY

    I scored 93% in that survey.......and I was reminded of summat an anvcestor of mine said: "We should not have children unless we can educate them better than we were educated or feed them better than we were fed." Amen to that.:guitar2::guitar2::guitar2:
  7. D

    GOD loves the CITY

    I like the idea of a "godlike" intervention. Full of "laying waste" and a bit of "smoting". Biblical retribution wouldn't go amiss neither.
  8. D

    Words I have Learnt

    Triple-dip F.C!
  9. D

    who has won round 1

    Nobody wins but club loses?!? Wtf?
  10. D

    Full Q and A's

    Oh dear! x 60 million times. I suppose at the end of the day people will see what they want to see. ACL could always install a specsavers on the concourse, why not?
  11. D

    FL to make announcemant later today

    Wouldn't be the first time, HOWEVER, I think in this case (still to be proven, of course) IF it is because of more sisu ineptitude they will have lost any semblance of credibility.
  12. D

    The Football League have to change their rules

    I do think the "FIT & PROPER" rules need to be either ditched or properly defined and stuck to. In POINT OF ISSUE: the fiscal arrangements of an anonymous hedge fund allowing it to set up off shore accounts to the potential long term detriment of a club and its fans should not be permitted...
  13. D

    Dear Joy

    The thing is Sisu's furiously spinning a web of lies kept a few of us on their side. They (Sisu) managed that despite all the evidence. Would things have been brought to a head sooner if we'd all wised up a bit sooner? I include myself in this before anyone thinks I'm having a pop.
  14. D

    SISU's Legacy to date

    Sisu, god how I hate those four letters. The imbecilic management is one thing but the deceit has been hard to stomach.
  15. D

    Have we been fielding an illegible team?

    Aye, Tis true, sadly.
  16. D

    Have we been fielding an illegible team?

    Aye, Tis true, sadly.
  17. D

    £60m debt. Sisu doubters proved correct

    It's just a scam to avoid actually meeting your obligation. It'll be transferred back to the club when it suits
  18. D

    £60m debt. Sisu doubters proved correct

    Football club owners want money Councillors want match day tickets. Fans want success Footballers want the earth I think we agree where the problem lies
  19. D

    £60m debt. Sisu doubters proved correct

    I see what you're saying but films/football club is like comparing apples with pears. We are stakeholders of Ccfc and believe we should have a say - this discussion is evidence of that.
  20. D

    £60m debt. Sisu doubters proved correct

    Oh dear! Obviously we cannot change what has happened but if we could agree what mistakes were made (some hope, I know) it might help us not to repeat them in the future. I would have thought we could all agree on this?
Top