Search results

he brought his farm to dodge tax, he can try and pretend he didn't but they are his own words

yep and then you wouldn't equate a list of innocent people with the epstein list of sexual predators

just stop now

I do, and their is frankly no implying of shooting anyone in that tweet,

Nope, he actually just wants to not pay IHT on his farm. The farm he admitted buying as a tax dodge. No one has threatened the stability of our food supply. It just stops people who buy "farms" as ways of dodging IHT.

No, I just think you are once again making up shite. Thank you for confirming this.

And? Is the whole world China or was I talking about the general world view on these people. There's a section of Russian society that whitewashes Stalin but doesn't mean he isn't seen as monster by most of the world.

As has been pointed out to you, where does that say he will be shot?

Come on Terry you know Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot are always painted in the most positive of lights.

Bit of a difference between a list of sexual predators and a list of innocent people who have committed no crime

Sarcasm is a valid response. You do seem to be whitewashing the actions he did that endangered people who had nothing to do with him? Before anyone gets upset, it is never a reason to kill someone but it is an absolutely horrible thing to do and yes should be illegal.

??? ok that makes it all fine then

Yep, Richard Wolf is just a left wing economist. He's actually pretty mainstream.

You said this to be fair "Maybe if the professors had been more open to discussing things instead of mud slinging things could've been different. Just shows the importance of open dialogue doesn't it" which is not trye as most people on "professor watch" did no such thing. it's very similar to...

No but it involves abortion, it is a very valid belief that 6 weeks is far too soon but it is still abortion which is like red meat to some in the US. This is the same US where people get killed by nutcases over abortion.

No, no nothing excuses doxing people and potentially putting their lives at risk.

@SkyBlueDom26 Why react like that to Pete's post? He did "dox" people he disagreed with and potentially put their safety at risk. That doesn't mean he deserved to die but there was that side to him as well.

Yes but no one can say this is "reasoned debate" ;)

yeah and i've watch lots of them and they all follow a similar narrative. he also never met a strawman he didn't like

Did he have reasoned debates? All the "debates" I have seen of his seem to be him answering other questions apart from the ones asked and attempted gotchas.