Search results

Dresden at the time produced the following " fuses and bombsights (at Zeiss Ikon A.G.),[160] aircraft components, anti-aircraft guns, field guns, and small arms, poison gas, gears and differentials, electrical and X-ray apparatus, electric gauges, gas masks, Junkers aircraft engines, and...

No, it's a fine example because it proves you to be wrong.

Dresden had a very large marshalling yard and according the Nazis own war office 127 factories producing goods for the war effort. It was the 7th largest city and the largest at the time to have a largely unbombed industrial base. It is not in anyway tenuous and is yet more evidence of how you...

They are a terrorist organisation, if the British levelled the Falls with bombs killing lots of Civilians would you think that was ok as the IRA lived and were based amongst them? No because states are meant to be better than terrorists. Can you justify stopping food and medicine from being...

So you say that rail infrastructure and factories producing war equipment are not military targets? It was as justified as any other raid on a German city in that it was an attempt to destroy war production. The issue is that BC's method of "Area Bombing" that levelled the whole city to destroy...

Yes, apart from I said this at the start "not justifying it". But if I have to add anything to your spreadsheet let it be this "The Area Bombing Campaign of "Bomber" Harris was morally wrong". Also you do know people with similar views can also not agree on everything, it is what makes people...

not justifying it before you start misquoting me but the targets in Dresden were mostly the industrial factories and the large railway marshalling yards just to keep things factual

nope that is still not an apology and no you did not quote me directly as you took one thing I said and then conflated it with something else. If you are too much of a pussy to admit you were wrong then it's only you that loses

That's not an apology

You are clearly lying about I have said and I would like an apology. For your "argument" to be "logical and coherent" you first need to not lie about what other people have said. Only words anyone wants to hear from you now is "I'm sorry for lying about what you said". But you won't as you...

That's why we had to sell him before we signed Wolfenden, can't have 2 players nicknamed Wolfie at the same time.

wait to 5pm

He'd best be getting his transport team on the train service before and after the game.

Yes, but where is the rest of the words within the quotation marks? You do realis In this case it turns out that I have only called Hamas actions a vile terrorist attack and not the rest. Why are you purposefully misquoting me?

Sheaf did it before that Sunderland game he allegedly went on "strike" didn't he?

Yeah, he's either stupid and hasn't understood what has been said to him or he is intentionally lying about what has been said.

No I didn't, I thought it became Genocide when it became clear the intentions where not solely to get any hostages but to wipe out the population of the Gaza Strip. When did I say these words "‘vile terrorist actions’ (your words) in October because ‘genocide had begun"?

I mean stopping all aid and food entering the Gaza Strip and letting civilians starve can not be call legitimate acts of war.

Yep, the Genocide by Israel was not labelled a Genocide and nor was it a Genocide at the start. A point @Mucca Mad Boys doesn't really care about though.

Read the UN definition, you are an apologist for war crimes at this point.