Search results

Someone said he was due one...

The full transcript of the debate in Parliament today is now available here: http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/hansard/commons/todays-commons-debates/read/unknown/1118/ For anyone commenting on what was said, please don't forget Mr Ainsworth has Parliamentary privilege which can...

Orient team: 01 Jones 05 Cuthbert 02 Omozusi 04 Vincelot 06 Baudry 15 Clarke 11 Odubajo 08 James 14 Batt 10 Mooney 07 Cox Subs 03 Sawyer 12 Larkins 19 Lasimant 20 Gorman 21 Bartley 22 Stockley 24 Sutherland

Team: 01 Murphy 19 Willis 03 Adams 06 Thomas 04 Webster 24 Clarke 08 Baker 07 Fleck 20 Wilson 09 Clarke 14 Moussa Subs: 10 Manset 13 Burge 16 Barton 18 Phillips 30 Garner 31 Haynes 34 Rankin

What did he say?

As there doesn't seem to be a former players news section any more, I'll stick this here: Steve Jennings: Tranmere Rovers return for midfielder http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/24628237 (Apologies if it has already been posted - I didn't see a similar thread)

3-2 to City.

These lines have been added to the end of the council protest story: http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/supporters-hand-over-petition-councillors-6223765

IIRC, he* did it then backed down when everyone told him how stupid it was. *or the board (Happy to have my memory corrected if I'm wrong).

So the results. First off, a health warning: This poll is self-selecting and has a low number of respondents (89). Secondly, while I believe it is only open to members of the forum to vote and to do so only once, there is the possibility of some multiple voting as we know from Nick that there is...

Just noticed this game had the second highest attendance outside of the Premier League yesterday (only Forest got more) and a bigger crowd than one Premier League match (Swansea). Well done to both sets of fans for achieving that in League One.

Some interesting ideas under others there. Mark82, I've floated an idea similar to yours on the forum before but it got shot down. I was told there is no way the fans could raise that kind of cash. :(

And maybe ACL are taking Sisu at their word when they say they have "moved on" and JS says "we buy or don't return"? After all, as Mr Fisher said, they don't bluster, don't posture etc... We could keep on making excuses for both sides all night. The point I was making was either side could make...

Fair enough, yes, it does appear Sisu asked for a short-term rent deal before CCFC Ltd went into administration - albeit at a time when relations were very bad between the two sides. Therefore, if they Sisu still want a short-term rental deal for the Ricoh I'm sure Otium will be asking for one...

Ah, can't help you there.

Have Sisu asked for one?

You have (sort of) got one here: http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threads/38040-How-to-get-the-Sky-Blues-back-in-Coventry :)

This was OSB's response when I asked if he could estimate how much real cash Sisu had put into Coventry City:

The results are showing as 40 per cent Yes, 60 per cent No. So Yes, you can vote No...

Which is why the poll states "in the Coventry area" - not "in Coventry". Given Sisu say they have been looking for sites on the outskirts of Coventry, not in the CCC area, only strengthens the likelihood that, if there is a new stadium, it probably would not be inside CCC boundaries.