Search results

Source appears to be that new podcast that Dawkins is on (not listened yet, but that’s what the Southampton page on X referenced). Could just be old news as he was loosely linked with Southampton and Ipswich before He’s now injured and been made club captain so less likely IMO

Where's the story about him wanting out by the way? All I can find is potentially Stoke (shock) wanting a swap with Lewis Baker

I'd take him

You need underlaps and overlaps. Tatsu had a little more joy against his full back because of MVE. EMC was a little more against it with no one pulling away the second defender

I’ll be interested to see Dasilva with EMC on that left. Think Bidwell makes it difficult sometimes when he receives a ball under some pressure near the touch line, he opts for a first time hopeful ball down the left which doesn’t always come off, we saw it a few times today. Can come off a...

My takeaway is that sometimes too many options can almost be a hindrance - especially if you’re a manager who has been starved of them for most of your career. Much prefer depth vs no depth. But three subs at once is unusual in football unless you’re chasing

Midfield needs sorting ASAP Thomas needs a good night sleep before game day

Is Bobby Thomas drunk?

He’s totally nullified because the anchor within the midfield isn’t there

Good to go in at 0-0 and collect ourselves. Eccles needs to move in there for Allen

Allen playing quick first time passes back to defenders, zipping it a little too much for when we need calm. Encourages Stoke to intensify their press Small snippet of play there with Rudoni taking his time in that role and calming it down. Stoke have to step back Allen unable to dictate in...

We definitely need an actual right back like BNC because it not only limits an important attacking avenue but also hinders our system. Put Lati there and you also effectively nullify Tatsu, put Eccles there and you remove a key component of the midfield.

Suppose it’s similar to a few top clubs now that have assistants rather than a clear number 1 and 2

If I have access to the app does it mean I have it? all I’m reading is I’ll need a “full sky sports package”. Ive no need for golf etc!

@Earlsdon_Skyblue1

“Hopefully we see them back soon” Robins on Sheaf and Raphael

I assumed I’d have this as a Sky Sports customer via SkyQ, now I have my doubts. I pay for Sky Sports PL and Sky Sports Football (I don’t pay for main event, cricket, golf). Will I get Sky Sports +?

Difference is they’re proven to have credible sources close to the club rather than just passing off information and portraying it as their own. Even Romano will put an “as per…” if it’s from another journalist and not his information/work.

I just enjoy a bit of good form rather than someone attempting to pass something off as their own. If he said “I’ve read on SBT that….” then fair enough. It’s also all the bullshit EFL transfer accounts, they make it up for the fun of it and don’t provide any credible source - that then...

I like to be bothered by it when it’s obvious they don’t have a legit source