Search results

Is it going to become another Allen? TBH I wasn't expecting him back yet anyway, so that they're even considering him getting some U23 minutes is a pleasant surprise. I just hope they learnt from last time and aren't trying to speed it up due to the injuries we've had to Jobello, Godden and Hiwula.

But they're taking about a rise in racism. That includes incidents of it, not just crimes. It doesn't go from "I'll keep quiet" to "kick their fucking head in". There's a testing of the waters to see what they can get away with using racist language or "go home" shite first. If the incidents...

It's easier to wind up people who actually take time and effort to formulate responses and try to understand the issues behind them. Someone who doesn't think for themselves and just regurgitates shite they get fed less so...........Ignorance is bliss. I'd rather be Triggered than Trigger.

Because thy can afford to because it's safe. They can get someone in they're confident will toe the line, vote along party lines etc. That's how so many of them that are largely incompetent get to such high positions - either brown-nosing or know where the bodies are buried. 'Rising star' rarely...

Nope. Feet firmly on the ground awaiting manifestos to make a decision on who to vote for. Not cutting and pasting meme's and regurgitating taglines and phrases lifted direct from the right-wing press. Anyway, I'd rather my head in the clouds than in the sand.

:emoji_laughing::emoji_laughing::emoji_laughing:

That's why I want HoL to be PV based on vote %. Still get to keep constituency MP's but you can know your vote will count so less need to think about tactical voting, plus the HoL is no longer just a massively expensive ancient body just signing things through - it could legitimately block bills...

I'm amazed how many people have already decided on how they're voting when we've not had a single manifesto released.

Ah, the nuanced, well thought out and reasoned arguments put forward by Dom again I see.

It was Ed Miliband who gave her the biggest leg up from the backbenches, so I guess she was fucking him too. Plus everyone knows she was only on QT because she gave Dimbleby a blowie and on This Week because she was getting DP'd by Neil and Portillo.

Let's try again. I didn't say he made the comment about Abbott. You said "Brought in from out of the cold?" after quoting one of my posts. I took this as you asking me why I thought she'd been brought in out of the cold, which I hadn't said. However, I had noticed a few posts earlier Grendel...

Go back and tell me exactly where Dom asked for a comparison between the trustworthiness of Corbyn and Alexander? He asked a specific question about Johnson's trustworthiness, so I answered with facts about Johnson. I didn't mention the trustworthiness of Swinson, or Farage, or the two Green...

I'll take your word for it that it was co-incidence - it is a common phrase. You may have subconsciously noticed it even though it was about someone else and ended up using it without realising. No idea what you're meaning by "So was this Abbott?"

Just co-incidence you used the same term as Grendel then? She wasn't out in the cold. She may have been loitering in the corner but she was always in the room.

Because you're making an assumption Abbott only got the job because of that relationship, despite the fact she wasstill prominent throughout her non Shadow cabinet years and has clearly had a similar thinking to Corbyn more to the left which in a Labour party that had moved to the right and had...

Why did you put the question mark then? Only makes sense if you're questioning my use of the term. I think you'd seen Grendel's post and used the term mistakenly, which is fine. I was just pointing out I hadn't used that term

Deflection using hypothetical scenario. It's not like Diane Abbott was hiding in a cupboard during that time - she was still very prominent in the party, parliament and in the media during that time. People will have others they feel they work well with and have a similar mindset to. I believe...

I didn't use that term, Grendel did. As for why doesn't Corbyn do anything - he should. But we all know if he can shy away from conflict he will.

While I agree that any such behaviour at any level of the company is totally unacceptable there is a massive difference between relationships between employees (even those at different levels) and harassment. This problem with harassment and the way he and the company were dealing with it was...

Unacceptable. I know we need as many people through the gates as possible but neanderthals like that can fuck right off. Not welcome.