Search results

I thought they were one at the back, one in the hole and one up top, with a couple of options on hand.

But we are. Plus Man City at times are almost playing attack v defence so the entire team has pushed up and the midfielders play far closer to the strikers than we do most of the time.

Did you get the info in exchange for a blowie?

Far more clinical strikers. And when they get that first goal they don't just defend it - they carry on playing the way they were.

Wycombe game may be interesting because we're away but with no Boxing Day game we should have much fresher legs. Would be great if we could get our first away league win this season there - really don't want to still be waiting for that into the New yr.

Welcome win but again that was much, much more difficult than it should've been second half. MR once again reluctant to make changes even when the balance shifted in theri favour. He recognises it as his post-match interview last week showed but in actual game situation he just won't do anything.

I think for MR he thinks he might be pushing the button a bit too early.

Probably means Godden will be going off in a minute.

Change happening. Second striker on for Shipley.

Does anyone else remember MR saying last week how he had the opportunity to change things and chose not to and had to learn from that? Nice to see he's really taken that lesson to heart.

We need to change things up. Whether that's Allen and/or O'Hare for Westbrooke/Shipley or bring on Biamou to go two up top and O'Hare just behind not sure, but it's just getting too frenetic.

He comes their second striker.....

As I feared they're far more involved since HT

Encouraging first half but you you're always a bit wary once we hit the break 1-0 up. You're almost expecting them to bring on another striker, us to retreat into our own half and let them come into it. But we shall see.

Is that sending messages via trouser twitches?

Never been interesting in going to watch a theatrical version of it, no chance in hell anyone's going to get me to watch a film version of it.

Personally I'd think if you were going to go above what is currently there you'd leave them in as a placeholder you can add to. Just removing them is far more likely to be because you're just not going to continue with them.

Wasn't part of the problem in the election that if you do neither they both moan at you?

That's your perception of your position. \It's not mine. When you talk about things being twisted, you're twisting what I've said to suit your own perception of what you think I'm doing.

There was a vegan festival type thing at FarGo in the summer my sister attended (who isn't vegan but will substitute meat-free etc for a few meals a week). The different styles of people there were quite staggering. One speaker was moderate and was talking about how it is a right to choose and...