Search results

Looks like the anti-CCFC brigade have finally arrived. :wave:

Signed it and will try to make it on Tuesday if possible.

Allocation is 3100 I believe. Still about 1300 left.

People do realise there are still tickets on sale? Not many mind, about 50, but they are still available as I speak..

To be fair, I was on the hill yesterday and their were some whoops of joy when news of the attendance came through which for me was the only negative from a good day spent with some great people. I'm not judging those that reacted like that, but that sort of thing isn't for me.

The police give the amount of people in the ground, the club give the number of tickets sold, so there is usually a small discrepancy given that a few ST holders will not turn up for whatever reason. Today the discrepancy was bigger because the game was on TV and clearly a few decided not to...

I must have missed her, I was too busy trying to scrounge cigarettes off people!

I understand what you are saying. It was my first time up there today after being a Sixfields attendee. I have total respect for the people up there as it is not a pleasurable experience and it must take a lot to drag yourself over there every other week for that. It is so sad that these are...

Went on the hill today. Said I would and I wasn't going to back away from that even though it would have been easy to have paid my £16 and watched it all in comfort. Was a bit dubious but credit to those people who were there. A decent bunch and not the slightest bit of antagonism towards...

As stated above, it is the lower tier we have been given (NL5 & NL6)

I'm not sure I want to have this debate again! It is SISU who have constantly bought up the fact that the council walked away from the deal, it was very much the basis of JS's complaints in the recent interview (and many times previously by TF). Yes, it did all take place during the rent...

It's an excellent charity. Done a bit of fundraising for them in the past.

What, last December? Bottom line is, that deal would have seen ACL debt free, and the council would have retained 100% ownership of the freehold and 50% of ACL. How that was not a good deal for the council I'll never know.

I don't disagree, but then SISU did agree to buy the Higgs share. Why that deal was not allowed to go through amazes me. Just think how different things would be now if it had. But then I'm not allowed to blame the council for that, people will start calling me names. Of course, why they are...

I don't see the contradiction at all here. It should also be pointed out that when Wimbledon played MK Dons last season, they took thousands. Surely, if any set of fans were going to boycott the place it would have been them? But they didn't, because they have moved on. And yet we are now...

People seem to miss the point. It is certainly true that it is not necessary to own the freehold, or even the leasehold if you have a rental agreement in place that is fair and which enables the club to manage the venue. We fell into none of those categories however. We had use of the stadium...

Indeed, but that doesn't escape the fact that the legal action was a massive error of judgement. It made no sense and the whole thing reeked of incompetence.

The bottom line, regardless of how you feel about NTFC agreeing to the ground share (and I understand the ill-feeling about that), is that the legal action was a joke, and it clearly had no legal merit from the outset. What a colossal waste of time, and I fully understand the strongly worded...

1000 tickets sold 3 weeks ahead of the game is poor? Since when? Agree about the website, not had a single issue since the upgrade.

It's what they always give. Was the same in the Prem.