Search results

Umm, can only apologise. I didn't know it was on. I saw the Trust thread, but just assumed it was moaning about the Trust, so I avoided it. Definitely would have gone if I had known. Maybe next time we can have a dedicated thread for Trust meetings. I would have picked up on it straight away then.

I do, but then I am also a member of the Flat Moon Society.

Yes, but you said it was only played by a small amount of countries. At the highest level, yes, but it is popular around the world and 104 countries competed to make these finals. And they have just reduced the numbers this time around for the cricket. Last world cup it was 14 teams and the...

I am not sure whether he will be gutted or not.

There are in fact 104 countries in the world that are associates of the ICC.

It does indeed. Quite often too.

Have to confess, it came to the super over and I put it on pause and went out and walked the dog to calm down. Oh, snap, stu.

Yeah, fair point.

Must confess I was a bit puzzled that Woakes didn't get to bowl the super over. Massive responsibility on Archer. Felt that Archer was more likely to bowl wides and the odd bad ball and that Woakes would be more economical.

Too much to do now I fear. Hoping Plunkett can whack a few sixes.

Sleazy? Never seen a sleazy bum, apart from when Trump had a financial crash many years a go.

Oh bum. Down to you Stokes.

One more wicket here and it could be game over. These two need to stay in.

Phew, Close, but a poor review and now none left.

What, the norks?

Welcome to Britain.

Except for those looking for a miracle cure.

Yup. No doubt

I think we are going to be well short and all out for about 160-170 at this rate. Needs some Morgan improvisation, or like I said earlier, Stokes or Buttler to wrestle control.

Yup. Think we will lose this as it stands. Need a Buttler, Morgan or Stokes to grab the game by the throat.