Search results

Owners often make the choice to not extract any interest or put it in as capital, often looking to use it to build and thus get greater returns in dividends later on. If the potential dividend to them was reduced they'd probably choose to take/accrue the interest instead. They have the risk of...

While I've got no idea what is or isn't accurate, it appears Saddle has heard from one source the price is £10m while another supposedly heard it's £6m and the argument is over it being paid up front or in installments. I'm wondering if it's possible they could both be accurate to a degree and...

Normally owned by the owners. Who in most small enterprises tend to be the people who do much, if not all, of the work. So are owner/employees themselves. If they employ a small number of people, often in less senior roles to enable the business to function, As a senior employee they would have...

Care to explain which bits aren't true or plausible? Or is it just a pithy comment because you can't actually argue with the points made but they're different to the failing system you desperately cling to.

Someone should tell them they don't need to stand IN the toilet to take a piss.

If he ends up being injured for much of this season, I think MR will likely let Eccles have his role and hope he can overcome his injury issues. If not, then it may have to be Howley, depending on if the loan window has closed at that time. There is also Allen. Unless we sell Hamer or Sheaf I...

The board of directors and executives, as at every company. Who are chosen by the shareholders, Who in that case would be the employees. So if they try and fuck the employees over by giving low pay rises and/or poor dividends but increase their own wages by a huge amount, those same employees...

Are they the polar opposite of anti-vaxxers?

I'd be adding a couple of million onto the price for the attempt to unsettle. Disrespectful.

This is being stored for if Sunak doesn't win and your blind support of the Tories will see you laud whoever it as as some incredible leader.

Well, clearly not because as I said it's swings and roundabouts. Why take a pay cut to get the money back in dividends? They just won't take any dividends.

Why write my own response when someone's already done it for me.

Keep going - I'm sure your efforts will bear fruit. I'm rooting for you!

I reckon much sooner than that.

Literally Also the same morons who when we have a few days of snow in winter are the first to use it as proof climate change/warming isn't happening.

Might go all Marxist here, but isn't the answer worker co-op's? Then if they decide to give the big pay rise, they get less in dividends. If they don't get a pay rise it's covered by higher dividends. Swings and roundabouts.

What % pay rise did the employees get?

And if I showed people I know and work with your thoughts on here they'd think you were a short-sighted, selfish arsehole.

"Businesses have costs to pay and if they go up they should increase prices to cover it to keep going." "People have costs to pay but when they go up they shouldn't increase the price of their labour to cover it and should just suffer." If people's wages aren't matching price increases, the...

Which in many cases, especially in big business, has nothing to do with an inability to absorb the costs but an ideological one to maintain excessive profits. They will always fuck the employees for the benefits of shareholders.